He was more lenient and was guided by Confucian ideals.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
After the Qin dynasty surrendered to Liu Bang, the Chinese country has become good in the economy. He followed Confucianism and promote it. He let go of his prisoners as some other prisoners ran away due to the fear of punishments during the Qin dynasty.
Firstly, he completely removed the harsh punishing systems. Secondly, he reduced the amount of tax to be paid. Moreover, he asked his army men to return to their villages and also asked them to start farming and agriculture. He recruited Confucian scholars to serve the government.
It depends on how it’s being said most likely at least A or C sorry i didn’t do much
It happened November 14, 1960
Answer:
There was no mutual consideration between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Explanation:
Consideration is a law concept that is used in law when finalizing a simple contract. It can be in any form like is being giving out by the parties involved in the contact as quid pro quo in backing the set agreement.
It must however be stated that in a situation whereby is only one party that offers consideration in a contract, such consideration is simply a form of promise and not back by the law thereby making it unenforceable.
The plaintiff and the defendant only had verbal promise on the refund of the school money without any form of mutual consideration thereby making it unenforceable based on lack of consideration.
Explanation:
The railroad felt that the demand for passenger service was inelastic and opponents of the rate increase felt it was inelastic.
Inelastic demand is used in economics to give the idea that consumers buy or use same amount of the product irrespective of the increase or decrease in the price of the product.
So in this situation, the opponent wanted to say that same number of people will travel by rail no matter if the price of the tickets will increase or decrease. The passenger service will be inelastic.
So the answer is "the railroad felt that the demand for passenger service was inelastic and opponents of the rate increase felt it was inelastic".