This is how I would go: (I'm just glossing over it, sorry if you think it lacks detail. :L)
<span>1. California does not deserve a seat in the United Nations. </span>
<span>2. The UN is only for nations; people in California are US citizens; they do not have a culture nor a culture that is exclusive to the rest of the US. In this sense, California is not a nation. (this is the definition of a nation bit.) </span>
<span>3. Federalism, the system where states and national governments share power. California (states in general) does not have the power to enter into treaties with foreign countries, nor regulate commerce with foreign countries. These powers are exclusive to the national government. This would mean that it cannot be given a seat, where these powers would be put into California's hands. I guess states governments would also fit into here somewhere. </span>
Answer:
D is correct because it is the only answer that makes any sense
Answer:
C
Explanation:
I think that's it, sry if it's not
It shows that farmers were being forced to constantly work for what they had, as well as giving the idea that they were good people.
<span>Latin America is comprised of an extremely diverse set of countries, economically, demographically, politically and even culturally. Economic difficulties and political unrest in Venezuela, for example, have created an exodus to the United States. Many of these people are seeking greater economic opportunity and freedom for themselves and their children, as well as an escape from the humanitarian crisis there due to a lack of food medicine and other staples. Other may be fleeing political persecution for speaking out against the government. In another example, many Mexicans have migrated to the US in past decades seeking higher wages and better quality of life. The ongoing cartel drug wars only intensified the migration, as eruptions of violence have driven many away from their home towns.</span>
