Answer:
harmful effect and no effect
Explanation:
No effect: most mutated genes destroy themselves before it gets to far
Harmful effect: an example of harmful effects would be down-syndrome (where you have 3 21-chromosomes and you are only supposed to have 2)
Answer:
Are you asking what factors effect mutation rate?
If you are could you be a little more specific because technically even you just damaging tissue increases the likelihood of a mutation occurring due to mitosis occurring to repair the destroyed cells. So every time you have to replicate DNA you’re at risk an increased risk for mutation assuming it was the result of something like a cut.
sorry I have to go
I think it 340 living in the wild and145 living in captivity
The ancestors of birds were most likely arboreal.
<span>Having gliding surfaces is advantageous in arboreal animals because it means less likelihood of dying due to a fall. You'll notice that plenty of arboreal animals today have gliding surfaces. </span>
<span>In the ancestors of birds, the gliding surface just happened to stretch from the "fingers" down to the body, setting up for control of the glide, and for further refinement with elongation of the fingers and arms. With this, the animals were not just saving their lives when falling, they could glide from one tree to another to look for food. </span>
<span>A similar process likely happened in the ancestors of bats. </span>
<span>Don't ask me about pterosaurs or insects, 'cause I don't know.</span>
