The way I understand the question, this would be because political majorities would in principle be able to do anything, since they have the political power (even immoral things and things which are not compatible with constitution).
Judges can make sure that the laws introduced are not illegal (that is: are not at odds with the constitution) and in this way they keep the country safe from at least breaking the constitution.
Also, they can make sure that the political majorities don't abuse their power in other ways, such as imprison people without a trial. People then "prosecuted" by the political majority can go to a court and demand justice
In the late 1800s<span>, people in many parts of the world decided to leave their homes and </span>immigrate to the United States<span>. Fleeing crop failure, land and job shortages, rising taxes, and famine, many came to the U. S. because it was perceived as the land of economic opportunity.</span>
Coal and wood are two sources which had been used extensively since the 18th century. when steel was commercialized heavily using the Bessemer Proces later at the 19th century. At this time, petroleum became the major energy source of energy and was even used extensilvely in other processes as converting petroleum to fuels.
Plato's Academy is best described as D. <span>a school of higher learning</span>