1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natalija [7]
3 years ago
11

What effect did Constantine's movement of the Roman capital have

History
2 answers:
kicyunya [14]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

the answer is D

Explanation:

i got it right on the assignment <3

gladu [14]3 years ago
5 0

What effect did Constantine's movement of the roman capital have?
Constantine the Great moved the capital of the eastern part of the Roman Empire from Nicodemia (in northwestern Turkey) to nearby Byzantium, which he redeveloped and turned it into the capital of this part of the empire in 330 and renamed it Constantinople.
Emperor Diocletian had created two imperial capitals in 286. Nicomedia was turned to the imperial capital of the eastern part of the Roman Empire and was his seat. Milan, in Italy, was turned into the imperial capital of the western part of the Roman Empire and was the seat of Diocletian's co-emperor, Maximian. Diocletian created a co-emperorship to improve the defence of the vast frontiers of the Roman Empire which were under constant attack. He designated the mentioned cities as imperial capitals because they were closer to the frontiers to be defended than Rome. Rome became only the nominal capital of the whole empire. Co-emperorship in itself was nothing new. It had occurred several times previously.

Constantine started as a co-emperor under the arrangement created by Diocletian. When he became sole emperor after winning two civil wars, he decided to move the capital of the eastern part of the empire. The creation of a new capital for the east in itself was not a massive change, because this part of the empire already had a capital. It is not clear exactly why he did this. One thing which is quite certain is that it was at least partly a propaganda exercise. Constantine was good at propaganda. He even created a fictitious ancestry from a previous emperor. A new capital built by him was a showcase of the new dawn for the Roman Empire which his sole rule would usher in. The city was named after him (Constantinople means city of Constantine) and was given honorary titles such as "Roma Constantiniana," "The Eastern Rome" the "New, Second Rome" and "Alma Roma."

It has been suggested that Constantine wanted to build a Christian capital, but this is doubtful. It is not even sure whether he actually converted to Christianity He supported Christianity, and promoted its development, but continued to worship the Apollo-Sun god and asked both pagans and Christians to observe the day of the sun, which was devoted to this god. He also remained the head of the Roman state religion. It is said that he got baptised before his death, but this is not absolutely certain. He built important churches in Constantinople (the Church of the Holy Apostles and the Hagia Eirene) and elsewhere: The old Basilica of St Peter's in Rome (centuries later in fell in disrepair and was replaced by the current one) the Papal Archbasilica of St John's Lateran (which was Rome's cathedral and the original residence of the popes) and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem,
You might be interested in
Why were westerners against a national bank
GrogVix [38]

Jefferson and Westerners knew from European history that a national bank could quickly become the master of a nation.

Explanation:

  • The First Bank of the United States was similar to the Bank of England and represented a partnership between the Government and the Bank.
  • Westerners still thought that the creation of the bank is against the Constitution.
  • Jefferson was the politician who was totally against this.

Learn more on National Bank on

brainly.com/question/1064665

brainly.com/question/5834932

#learnwithBrainly

3 0
3 years ago
What event in 1830 caused the perceived differences between the north and the south to be made public?
KATRIN_1 [288]
<span>The Webster gagne debate occurred in 1830. This had to do with the issue of nullification and brought the horror of slavery into the public debate.</span>
7 0
4 years ago
Who fought in the French and Indian War? Why?​
sergejj [24]

Answer: Great Britain and France

Explanation: The French and Indian War began over the specific issue of whether the upper Ohio River valley was a part of the British Empire, and therefore open for trade and settlement by Virginians and Pennsylvanians, or part of the French Empire.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements about time zones is true?
saveliy_v [14]
The answer is C, perfect vertical lines. (north to south)
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was the Black Death spread throughout Europe?
nadezda [96]
The black death was carried by fleas on rats, meaning that the Black Death spread throughout Europe through infected fleas. 
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Ivan IV is given the credit for creating _______.
    15·1 answer
  • Define: articles of confederation, ratification, full faith and credit, and shays rebellion
    8·1 answer
  • Lines 7-10 of Stanton's document exactly repeat the language used in the Deceleration of Independence, except for the addition i
    9·2 answers
  • Do these two go together <br>appomattox and<br>general Robert E. Lee.
    10·2 answers
  • What was the primary means of transportation for early humans?
    5·2 answers
  • 2 points
    12·1 answer
  • Why did the United Nations have difficulty in drafting a definition of terrorism
    5·2 answers
  • How did the foreign interference in Persia influence nationalists<br> HELP PLZZ !
    5·1 answer
  • Three Methods for Choosing Judges
    5·1 answer
  • Someone please help me:
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!