Yes,
oligarchy fits as a description of South African government under the system of apartheid. In the
political philosophy of Aristotle, "
aristocracy" is "rule by the excellent ones," and in certain eras of history or in some societies, one group or another has been portrayed as more "excellent" and thus more favorable for serving as governors. In Aristotle's political thought, an
"oligarchy" or "rule by a few" is a corruption of the idea of aristocracy. But Aristotle was biased, believing that by nature some persons are more excellent than others, that some are more suited by nature to be followers, not leaders. (Aristotle used such logic in defending the institution of slavery, for instance.) Today,
we might argue that any sort of "aristocracy" or elitism is always an oligarchy, an arbitrary system in which a few dominate over the many because of factors that can't rationally be defended.For another answer on a similar question, read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/9475348#readmore
It was mostly for new land trade and to convert the people in the Americas to the Christian faith
Answer:
Labor
Explanation:
A. Well labor needed to be changed, in the New World (colonial times) labor wasn't in favor for the colonists but, slaves and indentured servants were. Mostly slaves had it bad, indentured servants were there to work for you for a couple of years to pay of their debt and a free ride to the new world. America only wanted a way to keep people as their workers to build, cook, and farm for them. So they came up with slaves. Slaves were African people who were forced to work for their owners till they die.
B. To make "changes" Britain kept coming up with acts to set up the colonists.
C. Although their making only started wars and fights. So they weren't that successful.
D. Today we pay people to do their work but the people who did the work would not be kept. They'd still have their rights as humans.
(Hopefully this helped!!! <3 )
