Answer:
Scarcity and Utility
I will explain the concepts of scarcity, value, and utility using my laptop and some writing pens. I have only one laptop available in my family. I use it 24-hours daily. I attach so much value (utility) to the laptop because it is only one. It is very scare in my household. On the other hand, I have a packet of writing pens. Pens are relatively not scare in my household. If my laptop is missing, I will raise uproar in the house. Everybody present will answer a tedious query. But, if one of the pens gets missing, I may not even be aware that it is missing. At the moment, I do not attach much value (utility) to the writing pens because I have many of them presently . Writing pens are not scare in my household, as I said earlier.
Using these examples, I have demonstrated the concepts of scarcity, utility, and value.
Explanation:
Therefore, scarcity is defined by the value and the relative availability of a good. Scarcity is a basic economic problem that shows the gap existing between limited resources and unlimited needs. Based on the lack experienced with satisfying a need, one has to always choose between alternatives in order to maximize resource allocation and utility.
Utility in Economics refers to the value or satisfaction derivable from the meeting of a human or economic need. It is initially connected to the concept of scarcity. But after attaining some level of utility, scarcity temporarily evaporates. And this is the dividing thin line. This is why they are mostly used together. "Something that is valuable is scarce and give utility." Something that is not highly valuable is not usual scarce and does not give much utility, at least, to an extent.
Answer:
Land = $295,000
Building = $1,375,000
Explanation:
The computation of cost of the land and new building is shown below:-
Land = Parcel of land + Demolition of old building + Legal fees for title investigation and purchase contract - Salvaged materials resulting from demolition were sold
= $280,000 + $20,000 + $5,000 - $10,000
= $305,000 - $10,000
= $295,000
Building = Architect's fees + Construction costs
= $35,000 + $1,340,000
= $1,375,000
We simply applied the above formulas
Answer:
Explanation:
Victor's recognized gain equals to zero, because this exchange qualifies under Sec. 368 as a tax-free reorganization.
The event that will happen if he raised his price is If Kyle raises his price he will lose all of his customers. All of the people want to buy product who is low costing because they can save much money and they hate buying things that is so much expensive. The answer to this question is if Kyle raises his price he will lose all of his customers.
So in this case, you would need to find the present value (PV) of the monthly payments. With the information given, you would have a PV= 195,413.08, which is less than the lump sum payment. In this case, you would take the 1 time payment.
Another way to look at this is to calculate the future value (FV) of both payouts. For the lump sum payment, you would assume the same interest rate (6%) and at the end of the same 20 years period, your investment would be worth 662,040.90 while the monthly payment option would be worth 646,857.25
