The account holder tries to take out more money than the account contains.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option C: give too much weight to a small number of vivid observations.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the case that a close friend had told you that he had a bad experience in a certain place, a restaurant in particular this time, does not states the fact that it will always be like that for every person that goes to that place because it may have been a bad day for the employees and that impacts at their work while if you go any other day every detail is taking care nicely. Therefore that the people give too much weight to small number of vivid observations due to the fact that the article published in the newspaper must have been made with over dozens of observations and comments, not just one, and the major agreement is that those places are good ones to go to eat.
Answer:
$90,000
Explanation:
We could allocate assembly overhead on the basis of the parts used in the assembly process:
wheels ⇒ 300,000 x 2 parts = 600,000 parts
<u>seats ⇒ 600,000 x 3 parts = 1,800,000 parts</u>
total parts assembled 2,400,000 parts
overhead costs per part assembled = $360,000 / 2,400,000 parts = $0.15 per part
so the overhead allocated to wheels should be = 600,000 parts x $0.15 per part = $90,000
I believe it’s Involuntary Turnover. There’s a Quizlet that uses this exact same scenario that defines it as Involuntary Turnover
