Answer:
4.
Explanation:
Answer:
Thank you!
Explanation:
Also someone really nice said this, and I think ppl should see it!
Who ever is reading this:
I love u.
U matter.
The world needs u
hang in there ik it may be bad but u deserve the world <3
don't give up bby i need u to live.
i wish i could take everyones problems so yall wouldn't have to have em but i cant so just know ily and if anyone needs to talk u can talk to me
Pls pass this on. Everyone deserves to know this. ♥️♥️
just copy and paste its not hard pls this could save someones life
Answer:
Brought.
Explanation:
It's a "gimme" question. No other word fits cept for Brought and MAYBE bought.
Answer:
I dont think so. Maybe look on the bottom and see if there's a link to go to and look at the answers. If not, just look up the title of the page and a couple sentences after it. It's a trick I learned back in 5th grade UWU hope it helps.
There was once a time where my dad didn't try to run away from me. Lol
Answer:
It fails to support its claim with specific, credible evidence and uses a disrespectful tone.
Explanation:
When giving arguments in favor or against a specific subject, they must be supported by reason and logic as well as credible evidence that can be compared with reality. They also need to be coherent with the things you are stating, this has to be done in a respectful tone as you are open to the idea of others comments and counterarguments. You are supposed to show you are right with these arguments, not by insulting or despising others.
In my opinion, this excerpt fails in both. It is not respectful and it's arguments are not strong enough.
He states that there is not proof of who is right or wrong on the debate adressed, he needs to support this with evidence. Who states that?
He the concludes that "no valid judgment can be made for everyone on whether smartphones should be banned from teens." This seems as an opinion based on his own reasoning.
After this, he starts making judgments about the people supporting the restriction, calling them naïve. This is not polite or useful. As I said, this is not based on evidence, he is contradicting himself as he stated in the first lines that there was no evidence of who was rigth or wrong.
The next lines express just his opinions based on his values and thoughts, evidence to support them is never presented.
