None of them are really more powerful than any other they share the power and the all play a powerful role in our us government, to prevent any branch from becoming to powerful they would use a system called checks and balances.
Hitler took control of the western forts so they couldnt defend themselves
Answer:
Southerners argued for states rights and a weak federal government.
Explanation:
It is however possible to give a general perspective behind southern states reasoning.
Slavery is the most apparent example. I won't go into depth because it's been discussed several times. Slavery, on the other hand, had far-reaching and multifaceted consequences in pre-war America. Slavery, for example, became one of the most contentious topics during westward expansion. It was one of the most pressing concerns to be addressed as new territories were established and new states were admitted to the Union. The reason was simple: a balance between slave and free states was required to preserve the Constitution and its amendments.''
The second thing, which is also tied to slavery, are the States rights,especially a right of individual state to seceede from the Union. The political and legal debates about this particular state right are still ongoing. The southern states decided that the matter was important enough to take up arms and fight over it.
Then there are social and economic aspects. The Southern society was extremely aristochratic. This doesn’t mean that in the North there was no aristocracy, but average person in the North had way more oportunities to make a good life. In the South, hard work, witts and ability would lead you only as far as your bloodline would allow it. Before the Civil War, USA politics were dominated by Southern politicians, and there is no better evidence than preservation of slavery which couldn’t be abolished through politics in the Congress.
North and South were also opposites when it comes to production. South’s main cash products were sugar, tobacco and cotton. However they were mostly exported as bulk products and shipped to either North or Europe where other would make a final product that can be sold at much higher cost (like clothes). North started to become more independent from European goods. It still imported a lot of them, but factories and industries were built that aimed to make those same products at home and not to import them from overseas. South was unable to form any substantial industry, apart from cotton gin they never developed any industty aimed at making the final product amd exporting it.
This two reasons esentially made South a reneisance society in industrial revolution world. The average Southener was disgusted by crowded industrial cities of the North, where people lived in conditions that were often worse than what slaves had to endure. The society of the South resisted industrial progres from its very core.
Thanks,
Eddie
A.) This statement shows that the slaves in the South were passing through a lot of hardship in the hands of the white people.
The advert shows that they were being sold and bought like common commodities in the South of US.
B. A free slave in the North when he sees this may be grateful that he is in a part of the country were he was free.
He may also think of the rest of the blacks that are still in this condition and when they would get their own freedom.
<h3>Why Slaves were bought in the South?</h3>
The slaves were bought in the South to work in the plantations of the Southern farm owners. They were used to provide labors on the farms and in their homes.
Read more on slavery here:
brainly.com/question/9374853
Hello!
Option 1: "The government cannot be run by a religious group." This is true! The government cannot be run by a religious group, specifically due to religious freedom in the US. If this were allowed, American citizens who believe in different religions would begin to lose their freedom because the government would be based around a specific religion.
Option 2: "The government cannot stop people from practicing their religion." This is true! Freedom of religion is outlined in the First Amendment of the US Constitution. This means that the government cannot interfere with a person's religious beliefs, and all people have the freedom to practice any religion.
Option 3: "The government cannot make laws that religious organizations have to follow." This is false! Laws are passed for specific reasons and must be followed by all people, regardless of religion. Society must follow laws in order for them to remain effective.
Option 4: "The government cannot create a national religion." This is true! All American citizens have the right to practice any religion they choose. The government cannot create a national religion that all people need to practice.
Option 5: "The government cannot use the word "God" in any official documents or other works." This is false! The government can use the word "God" in official documents. For example, the Pledge of Allegiance (commonly recited): "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
I hope this helps you! Feel free to comment or PM me if you have any additional questions. Have a great day!
