the answer is C, by showing soundness of his argument through a number of analogies. :)
A because when you take over with out permission you take control so you hijack a scenario.
The author in “ Nights and Dragons” is Abigail Prynne. The main idea to this story is that dragons are a magnificent creature and that they were real in a period of time. She talks about how every since she was little she has been so fascinated about dragons. Now as she was getting older she wanted to know if dragons ever existed.She started getting discouraged because according to science dragons never existed. This because scientist would say that it's impossible for a creature like that to be able to breathing fire because no animal has ever done that . They would also say that someone would’ve found remains of a dragon.
The fragment that is made up of a complete predicate is option A. "could not be heard above the voices in the hallway"
In grammar, the predicate is defined as the part of the sentence that contains the verb and gives information about the subject.
Option A is the only option that contains a verb, in this case "could" and it is providing information about a subject we don´t know. The only options lack verbs,
A) path, paving would be the not acceptable answer.
