Moreover, Jackson felt that the national bank was a threat to the American economy and to the American people. Between 1832 and 1833, Jackson used his presidential veto to dismantle the Second Bank of the United States by vetoing its congressional recharter. During 1833, he took further action against the national bank system by removing federal funds from the Second Bank of the United States and relocating the capital into loyal state banks throughout the nation.
<span>The direct influence of the enlightenment in America was</span> confined mainly to some skilled artisans and elite planters and merchants.
Hope this helps. :)
Martin Luther posting the Ninety-five Theses
Answer:
The statement is describing the usual difference in trade policy that exists between monarchies and republics.
Explanation:
The excerpt comes from the Spirit of the Laws, by Montesquieu, who was a French philosopher who promoted republicanism and liberalism.
In the text, Montesqueiu is explaining than in monarchies, trade is very restricted, and is usually only allowed for luxury goods like perfums, spices, or silk clothes, because these goods are used by the nobility as a symbol of their power and status.
In monarchies, for the rest of the population, trade is restricted. The common people therefore cannot access goods from abroad, or can only do so at a very high cost.
In republics, Montesquieu says, trade tends to be more open. Merchants become the ones who do most of the trade, guided by their economic ideas. The merchants therefore obtain many goods from abroad, that both the nobility and the commoner can acquire for a lower price.
In conclusion, Montesquieu is using the argument for trade as another reason to support republics over monarchies.
During the election of 1860, Abraham Lincoln "<span>C.did not win the support of any Southern states," since he had been outspoken against the institution of slavery. </span>
