The statement that the Supreme Court must reach a unanimous decision for a ruling to be valid is false.
<h3>What is the purpose of the supreme court?</h3>
Supreme court, the highest law making authority/final arbiter of a country(U.S.) it works under the motto" Equal justice for all under the law". In the United States, nine justices serve in the supreme court.
The Supreme Court judges do not have to unanimously agree to a decision for a ruling to be valid. So the above statement is false. Majority rules apply, but the dissenting judge's opinion is also published. For example: as, four out of the nine must vote in favor to accept the case.
Therefore, it can be said the above statement is false.
Learn more about supreme court here:
brainly.com/question/12848156
The Anti-Apartheid Movement<span> (AAM), originally known as the Boycott </span>Movement<span>, was a British organization that was at the center of the international </span>movement<span> opposing South Africa's system of </span>apartheid<span> and supporting South Africa's non-whites.</span>
The ideology of Nazism is socialism, often known as nationalist socialism (NA-ZI). Recognize that Hitler was but one socialist party or fraction competing to rule Germany. Hitler required a competitive advantage. He struck an agreement with businesspeople. Despite their dislike, he was well-liked. He may have been viewed as a moron who would ruin himself. It didn't take place. Conservatives or capitalists had rightful interests. They desired to safeguard their money. They didn't want to give up their title to the land. Hitler had to make sure that these businessmen didn't feel cut off from their factories. So, he got what he wanted while also giving them what they wanted. After the conflict, they kept their capital. Specifically, real estate (if not destroyed). Business has conflicting motivations for Hitler to succeed. They would have undoubtedly wished for the conflict to end quickly. Hitler therefore rejected capitalism and its property rights as a socialist, but at the last minute he conceded title 'practically,' giving him an advantage over his unworkable socialist faction warriors who would only ruin industry. Therefore, he is not a capitalist. He rejected the voluntarism and property rights that are the cornerstones of markets.
