They can adjust by elliminating sentences that don't make sense
Answer:
Well a subject that you can write in depth is like space and NASA and like that or very complicated science topics or just imple physics. Like for science for example you can write a mouse trap car and explain the physics and the designs and how the best design can make make the longest distance or the fastest speed. You can watch a you_tube video, just search up “Mouse trap car Mark Rober” and you should be fine. That should take up 30 pages. My planing would be,
1-3 pages for the basics and ow it works
4-8 pages for the design and how it works
9-15 pages for the explanation how a mouse trap car works
16-20 pages for the best designed or list like Aton of designs
21-25 pages for the history of it
26-30 pagees for ending
Answer:
valuable is the correct answer
Answer:
A). It is odd that war should ever be viewed as an adventurous expedition.
Explanation:
Paradox is demonstrated as the literary device in which the author presents a statement that is self-contradictory or incongruous juxtaposition of ideas which captures the readers' attention and reveal a latent truth.
As per the question, option A i.e. 'it is odd that war should ever be viewed as an adventurous expedition' most appropriately elaborates the use of paradox in the given excerpt. The author <u>incongruously juxtaposes the conventional idea of war by presenting it as an 'adventurous expedition' which eventually turn into an 'exhaustion and war of attrition' </u>to highlight the serious concern that 'the causes for the war dampens over time and gradually all that is significant is staying alive'('no cause other than our own survival'). Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.