<span>The current thinking is around 200,000 years ago, but I would argue against this by saying that humans had not yet developed the same mental capacity that we have today, as some cognitive ability would have been needed in making art, which of course seems to have appeared around 70,000 years ago in its geometric form, where as the figurative animal paintings and carvings came to be around 40-35 thousand years ago. So, humans were physically definitely modern around 200ka, but mentally, this is unlikely. It is of course possible to argue that behavioural changes need not to be dictated by physiological or cognitive changes. Art could just be an invention</span>
For decades North Korea<span> has been one of the world's most secretive societies. It is one of the few countries still under nominally </span>communist rule<span>. </span>North Korea's<span>nuclear ambitions have exacerbated its rigidly maintained isolation from the rest of the world.</span>
<span>435
This question isn't quite accurate. The size of the United States House of Representatives was capped to 435 by the Apportionment Act of 1911, which is otherwise known as "Public Law 62-5". Even with the 435 member cap, the size of the House of Representatives did climb temporarily past the cap when Arizona, New Mexico, Alaska, and Hawaii joined the United States and went back down to 435 after the next reapportionment was made in each case.</span>
The late 20th century.
Back then, the knowledge about human psychology still hasn't as developed as it is today. The asylums during that time had the reputation on inhumane treatment toward its patient because they believe that mentally problematic patient cannot feel like normal people feel.
