Answer:
3000, the year of robots
nuclear war has destroyed the world as we know it.
the year is 3000. new york is an icy place ruled by robots. the once glorious, statue of liberty is now possessed.
kind computer programmer, prof. polly wu is humanity's only hope. polly finds the courage to start a secret revolutionary organization called the freedom fighters.
the fight is jeopardized when Polly is tricked by a tactless computer programmer, di suki snozcumber, and injures her left eye.
armed with a computer and guns, the freedom fighters try their best to save mankind, but can they defeat sinister robots and restore the statue of liberty to its former glory?
good luck :)
i hope this helps
**please let me know if this isn't what you were looking for**
Answer:
He makes a concession about imperialism, showing both sides of the argument.
He uses an appeal to emotion with words like honor and sacrifice to stir nationalism.
He cites evidence of winning the recent war to show that people still sacrifice for the empire.
Explanation:
Joseph Chamberlain presents his argument with emotions, evidence and logic. He presents the picture of both sides of the argument and builds a thinking among the audience about imperialism. He also tries to bring emotion and encourage the sense of nationalism among the audience. The use of certain words helps him to make his argument more appealing to the audience. He also had provided the example of sacrifice from the people's end that had brought good results in the past. By doing so he presents his argument with more zeal and appeal.
Sampson, George, and Rameck should without problems have followed their formative years friends into drug dealing, gangs, and prison. Like their peers, they came from poor, single-discern houses in urban neighborhoods where survival, not scholastic fulfillment, was the priority. whilst the 3 boys met in a magnet excessive college in Newark, they identified every other as kindred sprits that wanted to overcome the notable odds against them and attain for opportunity.
They made a friendship p.c., figuring out collectively to take on the largest challenge of their lives: attending college and then clinical and dental schools. along the manner they made errors and confronted disappointments, but by operating difficult, locating the proper mentors, keeping apart themselves from bad influences, and supporting each other, they completed their desires–and greater.
In We Beat the street , The three doctors collaborated with award-triumphing YA author Sharon Draper to deliver their childhood, teenage, and younger-person anecdotes vividly to life. The short “conversations” with the doctors at the cease of every chapter provide context and recommendation in a pleasant, non-intrusive manner. younger readers can be captivated by the men’s sincere money owed of the road lifestyles that threatened to swallow them up, and how they helped every other be triumphant beyond their wildest desires.
Answer:
tapping on the podium with the fist
Explanation:
Body gestures such as "tapping on the podium with the fist" are often used by good speakers to help make their points and to keep the audience engaged.
This is because "tapping on the podium with the fist" gives a sound like exclamation that drives home a point that tends to show the power and confidence on the part of the speaker.
Option B: rapidly tapping one foot on the floor: shows impatience or releasing of tension. Hence, this is not correct.
Option C. making a hand movement for the listener to come towards the speaker: is a means of asking someone to come forward only, not necessarily to express or give credence to a point. Hence, this is not correct as well.
The answer is FALSE because that’s NOT for the public
