Answer:
Women in west Africa is explained below in details.
Explanation:
Women of western Africa often began powerful, religious positions that harvested them honor and recognition from society. Taking on positions as commandments, spirit communications, prophets, and advisors, these women ruled the spiritual practice beyond the land. but inadequate governance and exploitation in some occurrences have not allowed citizens, especially women to benefit from these sources.
Japan must surrender without any conditions, or face destruction.
The intent of the passage is clear that the government of Japan has to surrender unconditionally and also commit to such action by providing assurance. Failure to do that will result in Japan facing destruction
Way country clock
Was the original
<u>The answer is "A group that has concerns about a narrowly defined subject". </u>
A single-issue interest group is a formal organization that has concerns about a narrowly defined subject and aimed to influence policy in order to create, maintain or change that particular subject. Some examples of what a single-interest group are interested in are animal rights, abortion, foreign policy, police brutality, gay rights, defending legal use of guns, etc.
In overall, they aim to achieve its purpose by lobbying government (including members of Congress, the executive branch, etc.), engaging in election activities, educating people about their interests, activities, relevance, current issues, etc., mobilizing people who act on behalf of the organization in order to perform activities, such as writing letters, making phone calls and demonstrating.
<span>The Supreme Court is most likely to be accused of judicial activism in cases involving: protection of individual rights.
Writing for the conservative group, <em>The Heritage Foundation</em>, Elizabeth Slattery defines judicial activism as "w</span><span>hen judges fail to apply the Constitution or laws impartially according to their original public meaning, regardless of the outcome, or do not follow binding precedent of a higher court and instead decide the case based on personal preference."
Cases involving individual rights are likely to elicit charges of judicial activism because the Constitution does not spell out each and every sort of right citizens may have. New questions come up that were not considered or specified at the time the Constitution was written. For instance, <em>Roe v. Wade </em>(1973) addressed the question of abortion and an individual's right to privacy. <em>Obergefell v. Hodges </em>(2015) addressed the legality of same-sex marriage. Both are cases of individual rights, where the Constitution did not give direct instruction on the issues at stake. The decisions on those issues, to allow abortion and to allow same-sex marriage, both are criticized by conservatives as instances of judicial activism.</span>
