The idea behind Nixon's decision to "freeze" wages and prices was inflation affects wages and prices, so freezing those would halt inflation.
When the total demand (AD) exceeds the total supply (AS) of a given item or service in the market, this is referred to as inflation.
As a result, the cost of those goods and services rises. This occurs as a result of people having money, either through high government spending or from high incomes or low loan rates.
Nixon thus decides to maintain a specific level of prices and salaries in order to freeze employment. As a result, the population's purchasing power will be constrained, and prices will eventually balance out.
Read more about Inflation:
brainly.com/question/13865168
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is option C.
Explanation:
Italy and Sweden both produce jeans and stained glass.
Italy's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained glass
= 4 pairs of jeans
Sweden's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained glass
= 10 pairs of jeans
Since Italy has a lower opportunity cost of producing glass, so we can say that it has a comparative advantage in the production of glass.
Italy's opportunity cost of producing a pair of jeans
= 
= 0.25
Sweden's opportunity cost of producing a pair of jeans
= 
= 0.1
Sweden has a lower opportunity cost in the production of jeans, so it has a comparative advantage in the production of jeans.
So, Italy will produce and export glass and Sweden will produce and export jeans.
Both the countries will gain from trade if the trade price lies between their opportunity cost.
So the trade price will be 8 pairs of jeans per pane of stained glass.
Answer:
Contribution per unit
= Selling price - Variable cost per unit
= $27 -$13
= $14
Contribution margin ratio
= Contribution per unit
selling price
= $14
$27
= 0.518518518
Break-even point in dollars
= $1,400
0.518518518
= $2,700
Explanation:
Break-even point in dollars equals fixed cost divided by contribution margin ratio. Contribution margin ratio is equal to contribution per unit divided by selling price. Contribution per unit is selling price minus variable cost per unit.
The marginal utility of the third Pepsi is 8 units of utility
Explanation:
Marginal utility attempts to measure the additionally fulfilled use of extra products or services by a customer.
Economists use the idea of marginal demand to assess how much a individual good is likely to pay.
The complete utility of that first two Pepsi is equal to 30(= 18 + 12).
Thus, the marginal value of the third Pepsi is equal to 8 (= 38-30).
Answer:
More likely
Explanation:
If the current market price of a stock is higher than the intrinsic value of that stock, it is less likely to receive a hostile takeover bid. On the other hand, if the current market price of a stock is lower than the intrinsic value of that stock, it is more likely to receive a hostile takeover bid. The reason is that the intrinsic value is the decision-making tool for the investors, which helps the investors to invest in that company.
