Hello. You forgot to add the text to which this question refers. The text is:
Pennsylvania created the most radical state constitution of the period. Following the idea of popular rule to its logical conclusion, Pennsylvania created a state government with several distinctive features. First, the Pennsylvania constitution of 1776 abolished property requirements for voting as well as for holding office. If you were an adult man who paid taxes, then you were allowed to vote or even to run for office. This was a dramatic expansion of who was considered a political person, but other aspects of the new state government were even more radical. Pennsylvania also became a "unicameral" government where the legislature only had one body. Furthermore, the office of the governor was entirely eliminated. Radicals in Pennsylvania observed that the governor was really just like a small-scale king and that an upper legislative body (like the House of Lords in Parliament) was supposed to represent wealthy men and aristocrats. Rather than continue those forms of government, the Pennsylvania constitution decided that "the people" could rule most effectively through a single body with complete legislative power.
Answer:
The Pennsylvania Constitution established a unicameral legislative body.
The Pennsylvania Constitution abolished property requirements for voting and holding elected office.
Explanation:
The text above shows how Pennsylvania created a constitution a totally different and radical constitution compared to other American states. This is because Pennsylvania, through its constitution, modified its entire political body, creating a more popular structure and accessible to all citizens. The main changes occurred in terms of who could vote and stand and how the state's legislative body would be established. In summary, these changes are:
- The Pennsylvania Constitution established a unicameral legislative body.
- The Pennsylvania Constitution abolished property requirements for voting and holding elected office.
Answer:
The Correct Answer is
States must abide by federal law because of the Supremacy Clause
Explanation:
When a state law clashes with federal law, the supremacy article proceeds to nullify the state law in support of the central law one as long as the federal authority is determined to be in following the rules of the Constitution. The supremacy article also suggests that states are not allowed to command, intervene with, or regulate federal issues.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the best option would be that the US waited for approval from world leaders before retaliating, since instead the US took a unilateral approach. </span>
The advantages when using nuclear fusion are the following:
1. We can have clean and non-polluted energy, no contribution of gases to the greenhouse effect or absorption of infrared radiation.
2. Effectively limitless fuel available
3. Very low cost of a fuel
4. No chain reaction
5. Fusion has the potential to provide abundant energy
