Which one would be right??

Mathematics

1 answer:

VLD [36.1K]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The fourth selection is the most appropriate

Step-by-step explanation:

Next steps are to put all the constants on one side of the equal sign and all the variable terms on the other side.

Among the choices offered, the only one that makes a positive contribution to that strategy is the last one: subtract 600x from both sides of the equation.

_____

Personally, I would combine the terms on the left, then add their opposite, 334x. This would result in the x-term having a positive coefficient. The choice offered here (subtract 600x) results in an x-term with a coefficient of -934. That works just as well, provided you're not confused or intimidated by arithmetic with negative numbers.

You might be interested in

Help,scatter plots please and thank you

Lady_Fox [76]

Answer: D

Step-by-step explanation:

Since a tadpole becomes a frog as it ages, it makes sense that the axis of the tail would go down as it ages since frogs don’t have tails. If you see the x axis as the tempature, and the coats as the y axis. It would make sense that as the tempature gets colder, more people would be buying coats. But basically, D is the only one that doesn’t have a cause and affect, so it wouldn’t have a very linear scatter plot. For example, I have the same letters in my name as someone I know who is 6‘ 4”, and I’m only 4’ 8”. So D wouldn’t make such a nicely formed scatter plot.

3 0

3 years ago

Please help me! <br> thanks

Stella [2.4K]

A) 45 mins

each big square represents 15 mins

b) 100km/h

speed= distance/time so it would be 50km/0.5h= 100km/h

Hope this helps! :)

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Anyone know how to do this?

Ksivusya [100]

Answer:

$x=\sqrt{7}$ which is 2.646

y=49

it shouldn't be mp soluction, but you can say it as No real soluction because you can't sqrt an negitive number

6 0

4 years ago

Unit rate for 56 in two

RUDIKE [14]

The answer would be 28

7 0

3 years ago

Juan is constructing a doghouse . He need four pieces of Ply wood that are 2 ft x 3 ft rectangles. He also needs two pieces of p

Vikki [24]

Hi there!

So, let’s start with the rectangles. You would multiply 4(2 ft x 3 ft) since length x width = area (for rectangles). You multiply by 4 because there are 4 rectangles mentioned, and each have the same 2 ft x 3 ft measurements.

Next, you multiply 2(2 ft x 2 ft), or 2 to the exponent of 3, i.e., 2^3. 2 ft x 2 ft are the measurements of the sides of the squares, and as you probably know, side x side OR side^2 = area (for squares). Again, you multiply the original 2 ft x 2ft area by 2 because there are 2 squares mentioned with the same 2 ft x 2 ft measurements.

Finally, you add 4(2 ft x 3 ft) and 2(2 ft x 2 ft) together to equal the total area of plywood purchased, or the total amount of square feet of plywood he is purchasing in all.

4 0

4 years ago