What did the government do in the case of New London? How was it going to help the community?

History

1 answer:

sergiy2304 [10]2 years ago

8 0

Explanation:

Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development. In a 5–4 decision, the Court held that the general benefits a community enjoyed from economic growth qualified private redevelopment plans as a permissible "public use" under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.[1]

The case arose in the context of condemnation by the city of New London, Connecticut, of privately owned real property, so that it could be used as part of a "comprehensive redevelopment plan." After the Court's decision, the city allowed a private developer to proceed with its plans; however, the developer was unable to obtain financing and abandoned the project, and the contested land remained an undeveloped empty lot in 2019.

Does this help?

You might be interested in

Which of these inventions most directly affected American agriculture during the 1800s?

AlexFokin [52]

Answer:

C) cotton gin and sewing machine

Explanation:

kus slaves and cotton

7 0

2 years ago

What were political machines? Who was one of the most famous and corrupt? *

oee [108]

Answer:

One of the most infamous of these political machines was Tammany Hall, the Democratic Party machine that played a major role in controlling New York City and New York politics and helping immigrants, most notably the Irish, rise up in American politics from the 1790s to the 1960s.

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

the doctrine of nullification was practiced to hold congressional power over states rights. who exercised this Doctrine? only so

Lelechka [254]

The correct answer is:

Only Southern states

Explanation:

The doctrine of nullification was created under the concept that the Union between the states was formed as an agreement were states designated power to a federal government so every state had the right to void any law they saw as unconstitutional. To void a law three quarters votes of the other states were required.

South Carolina used the Doctrine of Nullification in 1832 to void a federal tariff they saw as unconstitutional, and President Andrew Jackson reacted with the threat of using military force to stop the rebellious act because this doctrine was never admitted in the United States Constitution.

4 0

3 years ago

How did advance in weaponry during the Hundred Years’ War contribute to the end of the middle ages

Temka [501]

We learned how to make better weapons and yk that stuff

7 0

3 years ago

The Santa Fe Ring included some of New Mexico's highest officials. What happened as a result?

liq [111]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

In the late 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, a group of rich and influential lawyers in Santa Fe, New Mexico, amassed fortunes through bribery and corruption acts such as frauds in selling land. They were known as the "Santa Fe Ring."

These corruptive actions generated the ire of people in Santa Fe, initiating the Lincoln County War on February 18, 1788, after the assassination of rancher John Tunstall. Santa Fe lived a period of violence and confrontations during those years.

3 0

3 years ago