What did the government do in the case of New London? How was it going to help the community?

History

1 answer:

sergiy2304 [10]2 years ago

8 0

Explanation:

Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development. In a 5–4 decision, the Court held that the general benefits a community enjoyed from economic growth qualified private redevelopment plans as a permissible "public use" under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.[1]

The case arose in the context of condemnation by the city of New London, Connecticut, of privately owned real property, so that it could be used as part of a "comprehensive redevelopment plan." After the Court's decision, the city allowed a private developer to proceed with its plans; however, the developer was unable to obtain financing and abandoned the project, and the contested land remained an undeveloped empty lot in 2019.

Does this help?

You might be interested in

Examine the chart below. At what latitudes do we find the maximum salinity? Briefly explain what contributes to high salinities

sergij07 [2.7K]

The average temperature are highest near the equator and get colder toward poles.

3 0

2 years ago

What argument was Oliver Wendell Holmes making in this quotation about how the federal system works?

bearhunter [10]

The argument Oliver Wendell Holmes was making in this quotation about how the federal system works is that:

"The Supreme Court needs to be able to settle disputes between the states and the federal government by reviewing the constitutionality of state laws."

This is evident when he said, "I do think the Union would be imperiled if we could not make the declaration as to the laws of several States."

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Oliver Wendell Holmes felt for the federal system to work, the Supreme court should be able to make the distinction between federal and state laws.

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/17812433

4 0

2 years ago

If you were a settler moving to a new community in the Great Plains, would you stay and make a new life for yourself or would yo

ElenaW [278]

I would make a new life for myself because if I moved somewhere new, why would I leave again, if it has things I don't like there like or is terrible at life protection than I would leave, but if it has good than I would stay and live there.

6 0

2 years ago

Do you agree or disagree with his opinion? Explain why or why not?

Bezzdna [24]

Answer:

What is the opposite opinion?

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Help pls! read this excerpt from the us constitution

mario62 [17]

Answer:“All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.”

7 0

3 years ago