1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erica [24]
3 years ago
8

What did the government do in the case of New London? How was it going to help the community?

History
1 answer:
sergiy2304 [10]3 years ago
8 0

Explanation:

Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development. In a 5–4 decision, the Court held that the general benefits a community enjoyed from economic growth qualified private redevelopment plans as a permissible "public use" under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.[1]

The case arose in the context of condemnation by the city of New London, Connecticut, of privately owned real property, so that it could be used as part of a "comprehensive redevelopment plan." After the Court's decision, the city allowed a private developer to proceed with its plans; however, the developer was unable to obtain financing and abandoned the project, and the contested land remained an undeveloped empty lot in 2019.

Does this help?

You might be interested in
What is The level of development does not indicate how well a nation
ddd [48]

Answer:

yes what she said lol  

3 0
3 years ago
Question 30 (2 points)
LiRa [457]

Explanation:

programs aimed at reducing poverty levels in the city

7 0
3 years ago
1.the battle of the Alamo lasted. Days
Anit [1.1K]

Answer:

the battle of Alamo lasted 13 dyast

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the Supreme Court’s response to the Civil Rights Act of 1875?
PolarNik [594]
It didn't let discrimination in hotels, public spaces, restaurants, clubs, and trains and it was unconstitutional. 
3 0
3 years ago
URGENT<br><br>List some of the weaknesses of the Triple Alliance.​
Alla [95]

Answer:

The Nations in it

Explanation:

First of all, the triple alliance was an alliance made up of Austria Hungary, Germany, and Italy, but this was a defensive pact. So when Austria Hungary caused world war 1, Italy didn't join because Austria Hungary was acting like the aggressor, and later on Italy joined the allies against Germany and it's allies, so that's one of the weaknesses. This then left Germany and Austria-Hungary together, but the thing though was that Austria-Hungary was a super multiethnic empire and had too many revolts and uprisings, so this only left Germany, which was the only empire who performed well in the war, and that's another weakness.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which situation showed how divided the federal government was over "bleeding kansas"?
    10·2 answers
  • Which economic system prevalent in Europe in the sixteenth century involved using one’s wealth to create more wealth
    11·1 answer
  • What musical styles influenced jazz
    9·2 answers
  • The transfer of_____
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the US Civil war start?
    13·2 answers
  • What point of view provides information about others?
    9·1 answer
  • On whom did dr. mengele primarily perform experiments? how did he rationalize these experiments on these people?
    11·1 answer
  • What did the Puritans of Massachusetts hope to create?
    5·1 answer
  • Please help I want a timeline about Conventions of 1832 and 1833 at SAN FELIPE
    14·1 answer
  • What book helped to draw attention to the abolitionist cause in Great Britain?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!