Answer:
nature-nurture
Explanation:
The nature-nurture controversy asks which is more important in determining one's developmental outcome, heredity or environmental influences.
Answer:
This description of the narrator's feelings about the darkness helps create a claustrophobic mood and a sense of the narrator's fear and discomfort because of the dark: it's intensity, it's force, has an impact on the narrator. Therefore, this creates an atmosphere and a setting of suspense.
The correct answer is: Incremental Theory of Intelligence
In accordance with the Incremental Theory of Intelligence, intelligence is not predetermined and can be upgraded through an adequate amount of effort. The incremental theory centres more on behavioral aspects, such as effort and the problem solving strategies, and, also, in continuing working towards the way of the mastery of the task.
In other words, those who believe in the incremental theory of intelligence, think that their intelligence is fluid, changeable and malleable, and that it can be increased through work and effort. Student that agree with the Incremental Theory of Intelligence, see gratification coming from the process of learning and frequently see opportunities to get one step ahead; they do not place their attention in what the end results will say about them, but in what they can achieve from taking part in the process.
Incremental theorists when dealing with no-success, behave differently, they desire to conquer challenges, they began to review various ways in which they could address the task differently, and they augment their efforts, that is because they believe that effort, through increased learning and strategy development, will actually augment their intelligence.
Answer:
I. Viewing many television programs that associate successful males with football
III. Operant conditioning
IV. Gender schemata
Explanation:
As we can see in the question above, the boy contracted a very wrong custom of associating virility with his ability and taste for playing football. According to the boy, he is only manly and manly enough boys who like and know how to play football.
This thought (which is extremely wrong) occurs with the influence of some things. The first is the frequency with which this boy watches many television programs that show men, soccer players with a successful and well-established career.
The second influence is the result of operant conditioning, which is a psychological concept characterized by a form of learning that allows a person to associate a situation with a punishment. In this case, the boy associates the lack of skill and the lack of interest in football with words that cause embarrassment as punishment. For this reason, he calls his colleagues who don't like football "sissy".
The third influence occurs through gender schemes, which is a term used to describe the separation of things, activities and behavior as feminine and masculine, in addition to determining that only women can do what is considered feminine and only men can do what it's male. The boy associates football with masculinity and those who do not like or have no interest in football are feminine, effeminate and not men.
