The end of European empires in Africa and Asia was caused by distinctively strong forces of nationalism in the countries they had subjugated, with mass mobilization of the local peoples around the cause of their nations' independence.
The end of these European empires generated more new nation-states than had been seen before in other episodes of history.
These new nation-states immediately asserted an equal place among the nations of the world, due to the new patterns of international political equality connected to the creation of the United Nations.
I'm pretty sure it is called leapfrogging. Hope this helped
Answer:
because the tyranny of the majority (or tyranny of the masses) is an inherent weakness to majority rule in which the majority of an electorate pursues exclusively its own objectives at the expense of those of the minority factions.
Answer:
Jefferson advocated a decentralized agrarian republic. He recognized the value of a strong central government in foreign relations, but he did not want it strong in other respects. Hamilton's great aim was more efficient organization, whereas Jefferson once said "I am not a friend to a very energetic government." Hamilton feared anarchy and thought in terms of order; Jefferson feared tyranny and thought in terms of freedom.
Explanation:
hope that helped