A sit down strike is a strike which has a somewhat nontraditional nature as it is when employees take "illegal" possession of their workplace by committing to a strike at their work stations. Furthermore, employees 'sit-down' at their station but do not work. It is considered a form of civil disobedience. This differs from a traditional strike as in traditional strikes workers walk off their jobs and therefore can be replaced whereas a sit-down strike causes work stations to be occupied and therefore does not allow employees to be replaced easily.
Answer:
c.it presented new keys to understanding Christianity
Explanation:
Calvin’s Institutes of the Christian Religion differ from the teachings of Luther because "it presented new keys to understanding Christianity."
This is evident in the fact that unlike Luther and most Christian doctrine at the time who believed in acquiring salvation through faith, John Calvin concluded that salvation is a matter of predestination and it's designed for some people only.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is option C "it presented new keys to understanding Christianity."
Answer:
deportations to the killing center
Auschwitz camp complex
concerntration camp
Explanation:
Mao Zedong believed that peasants would make true revolutionaries because the peasantry force is comparable to intense wind and raging rain. It is increasing violence rapidly. No other force that can stop them. Their force will destroy all nets that bonded it and continue to their liberation. They will conceal underneath the militarism, imperialism, evilness, and corruption.
Answer: Race and racial inequality have powerfully shaped American history from its beginnings.
Americans like to think of the founding of the American colonies and, later, the United States, as
driven by the quest for freedom – initially, religious liberty and later political and economic
liberty. Yet, from the start, American society was equally founded on brutal forms of
domination, inequality and oppression which involved the absolute denial of freedom for slaves.
This is one of the great paradoxes of American history – how could the ideals of equality and
freedom coexist with slavery? We live with the ramifications of that paradox even today.
Explanation:
