1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alona [7]
3 years ago
6

Which political measure made colonists feel like Parliament was ignoring the traditions of self-government?

History
2 answers:
CaHeK987 [17]3 years ago
8 0
D. stationing of British troops in the colonies
expl.
1763 to 1776 would prove fatal for the British Empire because they would tighten their control over the colonies after the war, but the colonies would not like it at all. Before the war the colonies were ruled by a policy known as salutary neglect and they were used to being able to govern by themselves. However, when Britain made the rules tighter and decided to rule the colonies with more force, the colonists rebelled and thus the American Revolution began. The colonists would not accept change to their governing structures because of the lives they lived before. Self-government was so much better than rule from the British government so it was hard to go back to something very restrictive
Dennis_Churaev [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Not representing the 13 colonies in Parliament.

Explanation:

Self governing is all about having a say in what laws are passed, taxes, etc. And the colonists had no input and no one to represent them in England.

You might be interested in
What is the purpose of the declaration of independence and the declaration of the rights of man documents?
Masja [62]

The main purpose of both documents is to assert the rights and freedoms of the people to form their own governments -- governments which will protect their rights as citizens.

Historical context:

The Declaration of Independence (1776) asserted the American colonies' decision to break away from British government.  It included the same Enlightenment ideals of natural rights and liberties that would characterize the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen produced later (1789) in France.

The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen is a fundamental document of the French Revolution, which was written by Abbé Sieyès and the Marquis de Lafayette.  Abbé Sieyès was a prominent clergyman in France who supported the rights of the common people.  The Marquis de Lafayette was a member of the nobility who had fought in America's war for independence against Britain. Their document was written in consultation with Thomas Jefferson of the United States, who had drafted the Declaration of Independence.

8 0
3 years ago
You can buy certain supplies in the European Union or in South Africa. For the moment, ignore other factors that can affect pric
valina [46]
No clue what to say to this, i've seen it posted on this website here before tho
8 0
3 years ago
The WTO was created to
Leto [7]

This was to make sure trade could flow as smoothly as possible. I hope this answer helps!

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the fate of most forty-niners who went to california in search of riches in the gold fields?
dimaraw [331]
<span>Most did not strike it rich, but they remained in California and bettered the state's infrastructure. This was because they were a ready labor force, and the amount of gold in the gold fields had been wildly exaggerated. There just was not enough gold for all of the forty niners to strike it rich.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Choose any of the bill of rights (amendment 1 -10 of the US constitution). Provide THREE (3) specific arguments IN FAVOR why thi
Serggg [28]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

I am going to choose the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The three specific arguments in favor of why this Amendment is necessary in a democratic society are the following.

1.- One of the most important characteristics of modern democratic societies is that citizens are free. Without freedom, there is no democracy.

2.- People have their own set of belief systems and they will always have them. It is intrinsic to human nature. No matter what religion people profess, it is their right.

3.- The right to assemble in a peaceful way to exchange ideas, no matter what kind of ideas, it's part of any democratic government and society in the world.

The two arguments against why this Amendment may no longer be necessary in today's America.

1.- It is so implicit that citizens have rights that will come a day in which this value of liberty would have no need to be part of a Bill of Rights.

2.- Science and the use of logic could be a substitute for the ingraining belief that people need religion to have something to believe in. When science could be able to explain it all through the use of reason, maybe there won't be the necessity to include freedom of religion as part of the Bill of Rights.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Helen Hunt Jackson's A Century of Dishonor chronicled the injustices inflicted upon which group of people?
    5·2 answers
  • Can u help, please help me
    9·2 answers
  • British soldiers traveled to Lexington and Concord in search of... (select all that apply)
    6·1 answer
  • Vladimir lenin enacted which policy as the leader of the soviet union
    9·2 answers
  • What does the Reform Bills and the Parliament Acts have to do with the 19th Century?
    11·1 answer
  • Describe the lives/roles of women before the 19th Amendment .
    7·2 answers
  • Explain why it is wrong to refer to the side of the moon that always faces away from Earth as “the dark side of the moon?”
    6·1 answer
  • What were characteristics of the Roman Empire at its height?
    12·1 answer
  • Need help ASAP will mark Brainliest
    13·1 answer
  • The availability of ________ allowed factory owners greater flexibility in deciding where to located their plants since they cou
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!