Answer:
Situational Irony
Explanation:
Situational irony occurs when incongruity appears between expectations of something to happen, and what actually happens instead. Charlie expected to become like other people, but he is as isolated as when his intelligence was limited. He expected to be like other people, but was actually still isolated.
Answer:
Explanation:
When Abby was 7 years old, she did not like piano lessons. She didn't like to practice, and sometimes she even cried when it was time to practice. Finally, she stopped taking lessons. Some of Abby's friends didn't quit their lessons. They continued to practice. After much practice, they learned to play very well. About 10 years passed before abby became interested in music or the piano again. After she graduated from high school, Abby decided that she wanted to study music in college. She called the laugh who taught her when she was a little girl. The lady said she would teach Abby again. The lady needed someone to help her daughter with homework. Abby said she would help with homework in exchange for lessons. Because of this, the piano lessons cost her nothing! She worked very hard to catch up. Now she is making good progress. Soon she will go to college, majoring in music.
hope this helps lol :)
What book is this you didn't say
Answer:
I believe school should not have clothing restrictions and let me tell you why .
I believe schools should not have rules of conduct regarding with clothing restrictions because one of many reasons .Firstly , numerous of kids in todayś society express their selves in clothing wear . The clothing can either vary from crop tops to easily being flip flops . However, we do have antagonists against this debation . Some people believe that clothing can be too revealing too others possibly even cause hazards as well . This debation puts a great argument in place .
Clothing wear is a expressive outlet too society today because it gives a chance for kids to be their selves . it is a fact that students who are against school uniforms argue that they lose their self-identity when they lose their right to express themselves through fashion. This proclaims the fact that kids can lose the ideal of expression because the school districts takes that away .
The other side of the argument believes that clothing can be hazardous or too revealing too others . In fact 1/3 school injuries have been caused by shoes not being sturdy enough . For example flip flops , and heels . This side does provide a good argument . However whoś side are you on ? who do you believe has a stronger argument.
This is all up for a debation , The argument still stands strong today. Do you believe that clothing restrictions should be lifted ? Or do you believe that they should be in use for protection of others ? You decide .
Explanation:
I hope I helped . I wrote this out of my own type . No plagrisim involved . I did it all on my own . You have a nice night or day . Xoxox.
