1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jok3333 [9.3K]
3 years ago
6

Think about the Mongol Empire. -Who were the Mongols? (2 Sentences) -What were they known for? (2 Sentences) -Describe two impor

tant people associated with the Mongol Empire. Include WHY they were important. (Yes, that means two sentences as well.)
History
1 answer:
Vladimir [108]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: Who were mongols : Mongol, member of a Central Asian ethnographic group of closely related tribal peoples who live mainly on the Mongolian Plateau and share a common language and nomadic tradition. Their homeland is now divided into the independent country of Mongolia (Outer Mongolia) and the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China.

What were the mongols known for : Mongols were a nomadic people from the steppes of Central Asia. Known as fierce horsemen and warriors, tryants

Describe two ppl associated with the mongols empire : Genghis Khan, also officially Genghis Huangdi, was the founder and first Great Khan and Emperor of the Mongol Empire, which became the largest contiguous empire in history after his death. He came to power by uniting many of the nomadic tribes of Northeast Asia.

2.Hulagu Khan, also known as Hülegü or Hulegu, was a Mongol ruler who conquered much of Western Asia. Son of Tolui and the Keraite princess Sorghaghtani Beki, he was a grandson of Genghis Khan and brother of Ariq Böke, Möngke Khan, and Kublai Khan.

Why were they important : The Mongols always favored trade. Their nomadic way of life caused them to recognize the importance of trade from the very earliest times and, unlike the Chinese, they had a positive attitude toward merchants and commerce.

You might be interested in
REFLECT! John Green stated that it might have been better if the Persians beat the Greeks. Do you agree with him? Why or why not
Trava [24]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

I do not agree with what John Green said.

John Green stated that it might have been better if the Persians beat the Greeks. His arguments were that the Persian life was not bad. Persians ruled prosperous cities. And he comments that life was not easy in ancient Greece if you were a woman or a slave.

Of course, Greece was not perfect and had many issues. But the Persia Empire also had its many issues too.

I think it was good that Greece won the Persian Wars. The Greek victory established a foundation of a classical time in which Greece "exported" the idea of democracy to other states, as well as the philosophical ideas of great thinkers of Athens. Arts, literature, sculpture, and architecture were other important Greek influences that transcended the test of time.

8 0
3 years ago
ASAP PLZ HHELP<br>how does anne show courage in the diary of anne frank
ANTONII [103]

Answer:

As Anne Frank hides along with her family and others in the secret annex during the Holocaust, she shows great courage. ... During an air raid in July of 1943, Anne feels so frightened that she clutches an escape bag as her house shakes, but she knows she can't leave.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How did the Kennedy Administration know that the Soviet Union was putting ballistic missiles into Cuba?
belka [17]
Satelite pictures showed him.
3 0
3 years ago
1:What is the difference between the Taino and Colombus ????
tatuchka [14]
1.<span>At the time of </span>Columbus's<span> exploration, </span>the Taíno<span> were the most numerous indigenous ... Seventeen editions of the letter were published </span>between<span> 1493 and 1497.
2.</span> <span>Editor Allison Miller </span>introduces<span> the October issue of </span>Perspectives<span> on </span>History<span>. At the center of the controversy were </span>two<span> books (Heather Has </span>Two<span> Mommies and As the activist's T-shirt reminds us, </span>there<span> was a time when the idea that lesbians, that recognizes the </span>place<span> of LGBT people throughout </span>history<span>.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Which words best describe king leopold ii’s actions in central africa?
serg [7]

Answer:

cruel, ruthless, genocidal

Explanation:

Leopold II, who reigned in Belgium between 1865 and 1909, sought to turn his small country into an imperial power for which he led efforts to develop the Congo River basin.

Arguing his desire to bring the benefits of Christianity, Western civilization and commerce to African natives, the monarch convinced the Eurasian powers to allow him to take control of that vast region through an organization he called the International African Association and that In 1885 he transformed into the Free State of Congo.

This private institution was not linked to the Belgian state but depended directly on the monarch, who presented himself as his "owner." It was the only private colony in the world.

But behind the philanthropic discourse of Leopold II there was a great interest in seizing the great wealth of the territory.

First, of ivory, which was immensely appreciated at the time.

Thus arose most of the wealth obtained by the monarch during the first years of the Free State of Congo.

Gradually, interest in ivory was displaced by rubber fever, when in the 1890s its use skyrocketed to produce bicycle and car wheels.

There are also many stories about the crudeness with which this material was exploited in the territories controlled by Leopold II.

He turned his 'Free State of the Congo' into a massive labor camp, made a fortune for himself by collecting rubber and contributed greatly to the death of perhaps 10 million innocents.

In 1998, the American historian Adam Hochschild published a book in which Leopold II was designated as responsible for a kind of African holocaust, which would exceed the number of dead Jews by Nazi Germany in number of victims.

What there is a coincidence among scholars was in the brutal methods used by the representatives of Leopold II to force the native population to exploit the rubber.

The method to force Congolese to work was as follows: they entered a village by force, took women and girls hostage and ordered men to enter the jungle to collect a certain quota of rubber.

While the men fulfilled the task imposed to save their wives and daughters, they starved or were subjected to sexual abuse.

In addition, those who were not able to complete the quota that had been imposed on them were threatened with the amputation of one of their hands or those of one of their children.

Is it enough to qualify Leopold II as a genocidal?

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these is an example of a monarchy?
    9·2 answers
  • Which military conflict is most directly related to this passage? A) American Civil War B) American Revolution C) Spanish Americ
    8·1 answer
  • Can someone help me no one wants to help me anymore.
    11·1 answer
  • What role did the belief in gods play in Egyptian society?
    12·1 answer
  • Who was the first president of nigeria ​
    7·2 answers
  • In 1942, the National Resources Planning Board noted that because of their inclusion in the Social Security Act, blacks were enj
    11·2 answers
  • What religious group dominated the middle colonies
    10·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP!
    7·1 answer
  • What three compromises were made regarding slavery?
    12·2 answers
  • Men who made idols were afraid Christianity would
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!