1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bingel [31]
3 years ago
15

The pharaoh of ancient Egypt was an absolute monarch. How does the power of such a ruler differ from that of a constitutional mo

narch like queen Elizabeth of great Britain
History
2 answers:
Butoxors [25]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

<u>The main difference is the limit of power. </u>Elizabeth was subordinate to the Parliament, and the laws she would approve should be passed by the Parlament's houses. On the other hand, the Pharaoh had the power, he was not subordinated by any law, he was the incarnation of a god. Because of that, what he said was automatically determined as divine, and couldn't be disrespected.

Explanation:

A Representative Monarchy. This is the best description of the British Monarchy. The consolidation of mighty power in England occurred relatively early in comparison with its neighbors, especially Germany. The invasion and domain of the territory by the Normands created a noble class submissive to the central power. However, this nobility still had certain powers and they demanded that their rights should be respected. Then the Parlament was created to limit the king's power. In Ancient Egypt, the concept of democracy or representation was not common. Actually, it was completely unknown. That's why the Pharao had the might power under people's life and death.

Finger [1]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

In Absolute and Constitutional Monarchy the power is hereditary but in the first one the power of the King is not subject to controls and is concentrated in the figure of the King. In the second one the King fulfills honorary functions and is a symbol of the unity of the nation.

In absolute monarchy there is no written constitution or a declaration of rights and guarantees of the inhabitants. constituional monarchy has a written constitution that establishes the division of powers of the state, the rights and guarantees of citizens.

In the absolute monarchy the inhabitants are subject to the authority of a superior and obliged to obey, the opposition is not allowed and there are no political parties. With constitutional monarchy the citizens enjoy political rights, there are elective charges by vote, there is freedom of expressionm and there are political parties.

You might be interested in
What two developments in the late 1800s led to the decline of the cattle business ?
Over [174]
Growth of the railroads.The government gave the railroad companies huge amounts of land for every mile of track laid. This land was used to develop new towns and cities, greatly reducing the area of free pasturage available to cattle owners for their herd.



Increasing numbers of new immigrants. Many of these European immigrants set up as sheep farmers, which required much less capital investment than cattle farming. The sheep farmers fenced off their land, further reducing available free pasturage for cattle, and additionally denying access to vital water sources for the cattle herds.
8 0
4 years ago
Can I still pass the School Year if I failed the 1st and 2nd 9 weeks? Someone please answer
elena55 [62]

Answer:

i think u will still past because i new this one kid who failed the whole year but still pasted and went to the next year.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
The buildup of arms and an emphasis on defense spending is called what?
mrs_skeptik [129]
It might be war but go with war.
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which one of the following statements about the New Deal’s impact on the federal government is NOT true?
kondaur [170]
The 2nd Choice is NOT TRUE
3 0
4 years ago
How did thomas jefferson believed the constitution should be interpreted
Ad libitum [116K]

Answer:

As he did throughout his life, he believed that every American should have the right to prevent the government from infringing on the liberties of its citizens. Certain liberties, including those of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition, should be sacred to everyone :)

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What colony had the most peace out of all colonies
    14·1 answer
  • Which powerful country had money during the great depression?
    6·1 answer
  • which of the following was becoming more popular among people in north during the 1850's working on small farms, working in fact
    15·1 answer
  • Granville Woods's invention improved the<br> telegraph by allowing it to be used
    9·1 answer
  • Use the following image to answer the question:
    5·2 answers
  • 6.06 war on the bank- Step One
    15·1 answer
  • 1 What did Japan hope would result from its attack on Pearl Harbor?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following was NOT an event that brought about the creation of the Magna Carta?
    5·2 answers
  • This cartoon was created from a(n) perspective. The cartoon was created in response to the . The cartoon US imperialism.
    15·2 answers
  • How was the Ku Klux Klan affected by the passage of the Enforcement Acts?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!