I don't know how this is a question, but it is correct.
People who were scared a strong central government and total control (like the experience with Britain), wanted to give states power to counteract the effect. It made people like Thomas Jefferson feel assured that the U.S. would stay a democracy.
Answer:
A self-confidence allows you to experience freedom from self-doubt and negative thoughts about yourself. Experiencing more fearlessness and less anxiety. Greater confidence makes you more willing to take smart risks and more able to move outside your comfort zone. Having greater freedom from social anxiety.
Explanation:
Hope this helped you
Anarchy is the condition of a society, entity, group of people, or a single person that rejects hierarchy. The term originally meant leaderlesness. It refers to the curtailment or abolition of traditional forms of government.
There are various pros as well as cons of anarchy
Pros:- 1. anarchy is the search for complete freedoms
2. in essence "power for the people"; "each man for himself
3. You are finally free from the shackles of authority.
4. You can do whatever you want.
5. You are equal to everyone else, all social hierarchy has been abolished ( anarchy is the absence of authority).
6. The country wouldn't be split between all of these ridiculous political groups.
7. No taxes to be paid.
Cons:- 1. There might be some disorder when it first starts, but it's the same when a beast is finally released from their cage, they burst out and enjoy freedom, before getting on with their lives.
2. no government services.
3. There would be no punishment for crimes.
4. Life would turn into survival of the fittest.
Answer:
so it will be c
Explanation:
mericans encouraged relatively free and open immigration during the 18th and early 19th centuries, and rarely questioned that policy until the late 1800s. After certain states passed immigration laws following the Civil War, the Supreme Court in 1875 declared regulation of immigration a federal responsibility. Thus, as the number of immigrants rose in the 1880s and economic conditions in some areas worsened, Congress b
LexisNexis search, and you’ll find that “Trump” and some variant of “impeach” have already appeared in 37 newspaper headlines. (Duplicates are at play, yes, but let’s not get in the way of a striking statistic.) Documentarian Michael Moore has vowed to look for the first impeachment opportunity and do what he can to help spur it along. Law professor Christopher Lewis Peterson of the University of Utah has written a paper arguing that Donald Trump can technically be impeached immediately, provided that Trump University is judged to be as fraudulent as it looks. Allan Lichtman, the American University professor who predicted Trump’s win, also predicted Trump would be impeached. Clearly, no one’s wasting time on this. So what are we to make of it?
