Answer:
Your memory will change, outside influence will help alter them, that is why they are separated
Year's ago the was a class assignment or demonstration, that proved it, they staged a realistic purse snatching, in front of the class, the only ones in on it were the two performers ( victim and perpetrator) and the professor, and one mole, then the police responded in real-time, and conducted an investigation, most people saw the event differently and even described the subject differently, the mole made. suggestions like I think he had a red shirt and long hair( he had a blue shirt and normal length hair) and most agreed with the mole, some saw facial hair, some did not, it was obvious that suggestions from others influence what people thought they had observed, ( I do not recall the college this was conducted at, as it was many year's ago )
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Answer:
a. Ending segregation by eliminating " Jim Crow" laws.
b. Protecting the equality and full citizenship of African Americans.
The use of information to falsely accuse a company such as it occurred when XYZ ran a story that was not related to the restaurant they wanted to accuse is an example of False light (option D)
The false light is:
- A grievance of the laws of the United States that refers to defamation.
- They include a person's right to protection against false publicity to the public.
- This right must be in balance with freedom of expression
According to the above, in the situation, the cable channel XYZ incurred false light because they showed a video of a restaurant chain different from the restaurant chain in which there was an outbreak of E. coli.
Therefore, the chain of restaurants in the video would be affected by defamation because it did not correspond to the case of the E. coli outbreak. So the correct answer is D. False light.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/8512832
Answer:
Ano ang personal na pag-unlad? Ang personal na pag-unlad ay hindi isang milyahe at hindi ito nakakamit ng isang tiyak na edad. Ang personal na pag-unlad ay isang patuloy na proseso para sa mga pipiliing magtrabaho dito. Dahil ang pagkamit ng pagiging perpekto ay imposible, ang bawat isa ay may silid para sa pagpapabuti sa ilang mga lugar sa kanilang buhay.
Sa mabilis na paglaki ng populasyon at mga lugar para sa mga negosyo upang gumana sa isang abot-kayang batayan na mahirap makuha sa modernong panahon, ang kahalagahan ng tuluy-tuloy na pamumuhunan at pag-unlad ng ating mga bayan ay na-highlight nang higit pa kaysa dati. Para sa mga tagaplano ng bayan, ang makilala hindi lamang ang ilang mga lugar ng lunsod para sa kaunlaran, ngunit ang mga partikular na paggamit para sa mga gusaling mayroon nang naging pangunahing pag-aalala kung ang bansa ay patuloy na umunlad sa labas ng kabisera. Sa maraming mataas na lansangan sa buong bansa na hindi na tumatakbo sa parehong paraan na dati (mas gusto ng mga tao ngayon na bisitahin ang mga pagpapaunlad sa labas ng bayan upang mag-shopping), ang mga sentro ng bayan ay kailangang umangkop sa mga nagbabagong oras at magbabago kung sila pa rin nais na maging isang kaakit-akit na lugar para sa mga bisita, negosyo at mga nakatira doon.
Answer:
Explanation:
the power to commission officers, as applied in practice, does not mean that the President is under constitutional obligation to commission those whose appointments have reached that stage, but merely that it is he and no one else who has the power to commission them, and that he may do so at his discretion. Under the doctrine of Marbury v. Madison, the sealing and delivery of the commission is a purely ministerial act which has been lodged by statute with the Secretary of State, and which may be compelled by mandamus unless the appointee has been in the meantime validly removed. By an opinion of the Attorney General many years later, however, the President, even after he has signed a commission, still has a locus poenitentiae and may withhold it; nor is the appointee in office till he has this commission. This is probably the correct doctrine.