Answer:
A national registration voter act requires states to use a shared "federal voter" form to register voters for all voters in that and every other state. This form will be made by the federal government instead of the state.
Answer:
EMTs work on the front lines of emergency medical services, providing support to patients, before they reach a hospital. They are trained in administering basic medical care and CPR. ... Paramedics are advanced emergency medical care providers. They provide advanced life support to patients.
Explanation:
Brainliest is apprecitaed
Employee theft coverage inventory will not be reimbursed if the only proof is loss in inventory or land and profit calculation.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
An employer or a businessman can claim indemnity or insurance in case his employee commits property theft under the Employee theft coverage. This coverage can help for indemnifying the loss of property, money or securities as result of theft by the employee.
However, inventory shortages are not covered under this cover if the only proof available is profit and loss calculation. But if there is other proof like video of the theft, etc. then such loss can also be covered under this insurance scheme.
True, the irrelevant increase in the demand making the increase in the cost of the product.
<h3>What is the negative impact of the increased demand on the cost of the product?</h3>
A rapid increase in the demand would led to the shortage of the supply.
Shortage of the supply would definitely result in the increase of the price as it has inverse relationship with the price.
Quality of the product will also fall and pollution will increase.
Learn more about the demand and supply here:-
brainly.com/question/14741584
#SPJ1
Answer:
In Griffin v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination not only allows a criminal defendant to refuse to take the witness stand during his trial, but it also bars the prosecutor from urging the jury to interpret that silence as an indication that the defendant has something to hide. The Court reasons that the right against self-incrimination would be meaningless if a defendant’s exercise of the right could be used against him.
Hope this helps
