Answer:
IM SO SORRY I RLLY NEED THESE POINTS
Explanation:
Answer:
Criminal law is associated with the judicial and criminal justice system, juvenile justice system, law enforcement agencies and with correctional institutions such as prisons and rehabilitation centres. The main objective of the criminal law is to arrest the criminals and to provide justice to the justice seekers.
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) is a historic court case that determined that the necessary and proper clause gave congress the implied power to enact legislation necessary to carry out the powers granted to them.
In the case of McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), the Supreme Court came to the conclusion that the state of Maryland did not have the authority to levy taxes against the Second Bank of the United States. This was due to the fact that Congress had implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 to construct the Bank.
With what is perhaps Chief Justice John Marshall's strongest decision, McCulloch rejected the extreme states' rights arguments made by counsel for Maryland in resounding language while simultaneously giving Congress vast discretionary ability to effectuate the enumerated powers.
This result gave rise to the idea of Congress' implied authority in the Constitution, which holds that Congress has powers beyond those expressly enumerated in the United States Constitution, including powers that may assist such authorities in carrying out those expressly enumerated in the Constitution.
Learn more about McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)- brainly.com/question/20593754
Answer:
Explanation:
If the clause was inappropriately used, that is when there is a violation of the commerce clause of the constitution of the United States. Under article 1, section it starts by saying that "The Congress shall have power to...".If the Congress decides not to exercise such power, that does not violate its given clause, but the question to be expressed, is that is it a violation of the commerce clause to disallow the "mud guard law" of either of any state?. My response is no.
It is actually not ideal for a truck to make a journey from Florida to Georgia and from Georgia to Florida considering their contradictory law, but one can't always avoid it. Although both states may have pure intentions of not wanting to rebuff each other, overruling such law is based on principle.
I believe it’s a
Cause like I’m not good at explaining but I know it’s a
Cause it makes sense