1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yaroslaw [1]
2 years ago
14

It does not say all white men, but it says all men. . . . How does the second part of the sentence relate to the first part? It

clarifies the first part. It makes a claim. It restates the first part. It adds an argument.
English
2 answers:
svlad2 [7]2 years ago
8 0

Answer: The second part of the sentence clarifies the first part.

Explanation: The sentence provided presents the "not A... but B" structure, which consists in a negative clause followed by a positive clause. Moreover, by resorting to this structure, the writer directs the focus of attention towards the second part of the sentence ("but it says all men"), which clarifies the first one. In other words,<u> the second clause makes the first statement more comprehensible by adding more details.</u>

<u />

emmasim [6.3K]2 years ago
7 0
It clarifies the first part should be you answer here. i say this because one needs to clarify what is trying to be said. 
You might be interested in
If u can swim,u can save the child's life. (use able)​
Fittoniya [83]

Answer:

yes, you can

Explanation:

why would you put that question down?

5 0
2 years ago
When the real estate agent couldn’t find anything they liked in the older part of town, he took the young couple to a new subdiv
konstantin123 [22]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following sentences contains an abstract noun?
I am Lyosha [343]

D. Respect must be earned.

7 0
3 years ago
Common lit answer key for Standford prison experiment
Arlecino [84]

“The Prince” to further show how power corrupts.


is that what you were wondering about


5 0
2 years ago
What analogy does Paine make in lines 75-86? What conclusion does he want readers to draw from this analogy?
ololo11 [35]

Answer:

Explanation:

The analogy that Paine made in line 75-86 is that he made references to the British hold on the colonies as an intruder breaking into a private home to steal and ravage. "...if a thief break into my house, burn and destroy my property, and kill or threaten to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever," to his absolute will, am I to suffer it?" This was the analogy Paine made in line 78-86 and the conclusion he drew.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was an advantage of the Land Ordinance of 1785?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following scenarios would most likely be considered situational irony?
    12·2 answers
  • Which sentence uses possessive personal pronouns correctly?
    7·2 answers
  • The plural of foramen is<br> a. forami.<br> b. foramenae.<br> c. foramina.<br> d. forames.
    9·1 answer
  • Read the following sentence: "Columbus's incomplete knowledge of world geography and the imprecise navigational devices he broug
    10·1 answer
  • Have you ever read the book Tom Sawyer if so, expain the main problem and how this problem was solved in your apinion.
    6·1 answer
  • Put the verbs into the correct form of the past simple tense
    12·1 answer
  • They dug a tunnel ........ the wall​
    8·1 answer
  • What do we owe to members of our family (whether biological or not)? What is the limit to our loyalty?
    11·2 answers
  • A school preparing for the real world?​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!