Well...... I'm confused too but I'll go with:
<span>Simplifying
X</span>2<span> + 8x + -55 = 10
Reorder the terms:
-55 + X</span>2<span> + 8x = 10
Solving
-55 + X</span>2<span> + 8x = 10
Solving for variable 'X'.
Move all terms containing X to the left, all other terms to the right.
Add '55' to each side of the equation.
-55 + X</span>2<span> + 55 + 8x = 10 + 55
Reorder the terms:
-55 + 55 + X</span>2<span> + 8x = 10 + 55
Combine like terms: -55 + 55 = 0
0 + X</span>2<span> + 8x = 10 + 55
</span>X2<span> + 8x = 10 + 55
Combine like terms: 10 + 55 = 65
X</span>2<span> + 8x = 65
Add '-8x' to each side of the equation.
X</span>2<span> + 8x + -8x = 65 + -8x
Combine like terms: 8x + -8x = 0
X</span>2<span> + 0 = 65 + -8x
X</span>2<span> = 65 + -8x
Simplifying
X</span>2<span> = 65 + -8x
Reorder the terms:
-65 + X</span>2<span> + 8x = 65 + -8x + -65 + 8x
Reorder the terms:
-65 + X</span>2<span> + 8x = 65 + -65 + -8x + 8x
Combine like terms: 65 + -65 = 0
-65 + X</span>2<span> + 8x = 0 + -8x + 8x
-65 + X</span>2<span> + 8x = -8x + 8x
Combine like terms: -8x + 8</span><span>x = 0
-65 + X</span>2<span> + 8x = 0
-Hope this helps!!</span>
False because deviance is not a response to learned behavior
Answer:
The best response of the options provided is Option B: Conflict theory.
Explanation:
The best choice of the options provided is conflict theory because conflict theorists take a critical stance toward existing social arrangements like the way that illness is defined. This can affect the access that people without power have to services or to livelihood, if the way that the powerful define illness works to their disadvantage in some way. An example would be denying someone disability status because their condition is not recognized as an illness that can affect productivity. This could make it so the person who is less powerful has to continue working despite their illness or disability and it may deny them benefits.
Both Brazil and Columbia are neighbouring countries with Peru and Venezuela.
Hope my answer helps :)