1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Genrish500 [490]
3 years ago
11

Think About ItDo you think the two-party system is a good one? Explain why or why not.​

History
1 answer:
andrew11 [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

When George Washington took office in 1789, there were no defined political parties. Washington even made a statement condemning the development of highly partisan politics, as it may become a distraction from serving the American people. This, however, did not stop the Founders from taking sides on key issues that were plaguing the young nation and it was from these differences that the first political parties grew. Today, the United States is at a crossroads. Third party candidates got more votes in the 2016 Presidential Election than ever before. Does this mean the two-party system is antiquated, or is it working well for the United States as whole? Ultimately, we must ask, is the two-party system the most effective way for us to participate in modern American politics?

Those in favor of the two-party system believe that it can simplify politics for many Americans by providing political platforms. Additionally, the two-party system has a historical precedence of functioning well in the American version of a democratic republic.

Those against the two-party system believe that it does not offer sufficient room for new ideas and third-party candidates. Additionally, some believe that civil discourse among family, friends, and government officials is experiencing a break down through the intense polarization that can result from a two-party system.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which of the following was a characteristic of government proposed by the Virginia Plan?
Arada [10]

Answer:

D. It called for three branches of government.

Explanation:

James Madison's Virginia Plan, introduced to the Constitutional Convention in 1787, envisioned a powerful national government with three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial.

3 0
2 years ago
What’s the answer ??
lianna [129]

Answer:

typhoon, the other 3 are all direct results of being in the ring of fire

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What 3 things brought the fall of Rome when they all hit at once
Vitek1552 [10]

It was to big the city cant, control the people

A whole bunch of refugees came inside the city

5 0
3 years ago
Choose one of the public policy recommendations made by the author, and write a short paragraph describing it. How do you think
DiKsa [7]

Answer:

The author describes the importance of immigration reform to boost immigration of scientists and engineers from other countries to the United States. The author mentions that the United States grants too few work visas to foreign scientists. We can foster innovation by giving more foreign scientists and engineers extended work visas. This policy would mean the United States could bring the best scientists to work on US projects right now. However, one downside is that this policy doesn’t address the lack of American students studying to be scientists and engineers.

Explanation:

Sample Answer

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the renaissance what caused the demand for slaves to soar?
sashaice [31]

Answer:

Explanation:

The question – “what caused the slave trade to increase during the early 1800s” – is a little difficult to answer unless one posits that it is a trick question intended to determine whether a particular student has done his or her homework.  Having peaked during the mid-18th Century, the slave trade actually began to contract considerably by the end of that century.  Debates in Europe and in North America regarding the morality of the slave trade resulted in growing sentiments against the practice, with laws being passed on both sides of the Atlantic outlawing the trade in slaves.  Article 1, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution stated that states could continue to import slaves, but that after 20 years, that right could be abolished:

“The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.”

As soon as that 20-year period was over, however, the Congress passed the Act Prohibiting the Importation of Slaves, banning the trans-Atlantic slave trade.  That Act’s opening provision read as follows:

“Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the first day of January, one thousand eight hundred and eight, it shall not be lawful to import or bring into the United States or the territories thereof from any foreign kingdom, place, or country, any negro, mulatto, or person of colour, with intent to hold, sell, or dispose of such negro, mulatto, or person of colour, as a slave, or to be held to service or labour.”

With the passage of this law, the slave trade was effectively declared illegal.  Deep divisions between the northern and southern portions of the country, however, would continue, especially with respect to the issue of slavery.  The South’s defeat in the Civil War (1860-1865) would finally end the practice once and for all.  It is incorrect, however, to suggest that the trade reached its peak during the very period when European colonial powers themselves were increasingly banning the practice.  The British, in fact, became militarily active in preventing the trade by dispatching its navy, the strongest in the world, to patrol the coast of West Africa with orders to intercept all vessels transporting slaves.  

Beyond issues of morality, another reason for the decline in the slave trade was simple economics.  Slaves were an important part of the agricultural economies of many countries, especially in North America, but the onset of the industrial revolution made the manpower requirements that drove the slave trade increasingly obsolete.  The American South, of course, was a predominately agrarian society, with plantations providing the bulk of the region’s economic wealth.  As Europe and the northern regions of the United States ushered in more advanced means of production, the need for slaves diminished.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How can archaeological information based in pseudoscience be recognized.
    11·1 answer
  • How Did Portugal benefit from these early voyages
    5·1 answer
  • During the Great Depression, the national unemployment rate across the United States peaked at 25%, although the rate in _______
    11·2 answers
  • The world has remembered not only what Lincoln said, but also what he did. He is considered one of the greatest United States pr
    14·2 answers
  • What was the main reason for the U.S oil embargo on Japan
    7·1 answer
  • Did James Madison think any enforcement of religion by the state was a threat to the religion?
    7·1 answer
  • What is a secondary source?
    13·2 answers
  • Someone who has some predetermined prejudice is considered
    9·1 answer
  • Who destroyed the western roman empire
    10·1 answer
  • A person uses eyeglasses to see more clearly.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!