1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Genrish500 [490]
3 years ago
11

Think About ItDo you think the two-party system is a good one? Explain why or why not.​

History
1 answer:
andrew11 [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

When George Washington took office in 1789, there were no defined political parties. Washington even made a statement condemning the development of highly partisan politics, as it may become a distraction from serving the American people. This, however, did not stop the Founders from taking sides on key issues that were plaguing the young nation and it was from these differences that the first political parties grew. Today, the United States is at a crossroads. Third party candidates got more votes in the 2016 Presidential Election than ever before. Does this mean the two-party system is antiquated, or is it working well for the United States as whole? Ultimately, we must ask, is the two-party system the most effective way for us to participate in modern American politics?

Those in favor of the two-party system believe that it can simplify politics for many Americans by providing political platforms. Additionally, the two-party system has a historical precedence of functioning well in the American version of a democratic republic.

Those against the two-party system believe that it does not offer sufficient room for new ideas and third-party candidates. Additionally, some believe that civil discourse among family, friends, and government officials is experiencing a break down through the intense polarization that can result from a two-party system.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why couldn't George Washington's army raise money
goblinko [34]

When the Second Continental Congress met in June 1775, they were not prepared for what they found. Several months earlier on April 19 the war of words with Great Britain had become a shooting war.  The individual colonies found themselves at war with one of the greatest military powers of the age.  It would fall on the delegates of the Continental Congress to lead them the best they could with a strong united voice that would see them through the crisis, or maybe not. Congress was not really prepared to become a governmental body. These men who were sent to discuss issues and send petitions suddenly found themselves placed in the position of having to create a united front from thirteen separate entities. They would be tasked with coming up with a military response, building an army, and finding some way to pay for all of it. They were, to say the least, not always up to that task. While many of the men that served in congress had experience running business or even colonial government, the task set ahead of them was more than they had ever done before. In many of the tasks set before it, Congress either failed or nearly failed, nearly causing the still birth of the great republic.

Nowhere did Congress fail as abysmally as it did in trying to create some way to generate money that would support the war. There were several sources they would look to in an effort to pay the bills. Getting support from the states and foreign powers was one path they took. Steps were even taken to try and build a real economy that would see them through the war and perhaps thereafter.  Each came with its own set of difficulties.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Police power, in law, is the right of _______ to make laws necessary for the health, morals, and welfare of the populace.
saw5 [17]

Answer:

b. the government

Explanation:

E2020:)

3 0
3 years ago
Instructions: Select the correct answer.
lubasha [3.4K]
The winter in Norway is long and harsh.
8 0
4 years ago
What did General Washington and the United States have to do to win the
mash [69]

Answer:

They had be able to continue to fight and cost the British large sums of money, deaths of their soldiers, and drag out the length of time for the fighting to wear them down and turn British public opinion.

Explanation:

America won the revolution because the British were tired of paying money and sending supplies for a war, so they surrendered. Washington knew that we didn't have to be the best fighters, we just have to prolong the war until the British got tired.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Stalin insist that Roosevelt and Churchill open a second front in France?
aleksklad [387]

Stain insisted that Roosevelt and Churchill open a second front in France just to get rid of the pressure that the German forces were giving the Soviet Union

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following Supreme Court decisions declared that the Cherokee Nation was not subject to Georgia law?
    6·2 answers
  • List six freedoms of expression guaranteed in the first amendment
    6·1 answer
  • Need help with this question
    13·1 answer
  • After a bill has passed both houses, it is sent to the president who has
    9·2 answers
  • An area of early civilization between the Persian Gulf and the Mediterranean
    11·1 answer
  • NEED HELPP NOWW FAST RIGHT AMSWERS!!!!!!!
    5·2 answers
  • The diagram below shows that the Roman Republic contributed to the development of democratic principles.
    6·2 answers
  • Omg I need help, please help me
    14·1 answer
  • Which continent has a bigger population North<br> America or Africa
    13·2 answers
  • during the 20th century, the general trend in the united states is to move closer to the ideas of adam smith about the role of g
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!