1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Genrish500 [490]
3 years ago
11

Think About ItDo you think the two-party system is a good one? Explain why or why not.​

History
1 answer:
andrew11 [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

When George Washington took office in 1789, there were no defined political parties. Washington even made a statement condemning the development of highly partisan politics, as it may become a distraction from serving the American people. This, however, did not stop the Founders from taking sides on key issues that were plaguing the young nation and it was from these differences that the first political parties grew. Today, the United States is at a crossroads. Third party candidates got more votes in the 2016 Presidential Election than ever before. Does this mean the two-party system is antiquated, or is it working well for the United States as whole? Ultimately, we must ask, is the two-party system the most effective way for us to participate in modern American politics?

Those in favor of the two-party system believe that it can simplify politics for many Americans by providing political platforms. Additionally, the two-party system has a historical precedence of functioning well in the American version of a democratic republic.

Those against the two-party system believe that it does not offer sufficient room for new ideas and third-party candidates. Additionally, some believe that civil discourse among family, friends, and government officials is experiencing a break down through the intense polarization that can result from a two-party system.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
I'LL MAKE YOU BRAINLIEST PLEAZE PLEAZE PLEAZE 50 POINTS! I JUST NEED LIKE 2 SENTENCES OR 3 BULLET POINTS
Alexandra [31]

Well he is basically letting serial killers go off onto the streets and into everyday peoples lives. They will involve themselves with people and eventually kill or cause harm to people again. They wont learn from there mistakes if they dont get punished for them.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
by the mid-nineteenth century, why did steel rather than iron begin to be used in some tools, machines, and structures?
serious [3.7K]

Steel is stronger than iron is a  the mid-nineteenth century, why did steel rather than iron begin to be used in some tools, machines, and structures.

<h3>What changes occurred in manufacturing in the 19th century?</h3>

Work was frequently done in factories that were constructed to house the machines as the pace of work typically increased. Factory management finally started enforcing an industrial discipline, making employees work predetermined, frequently extremely long hours.

<h3>How did the late 19th century's innovations and advances alter how people worked?</h3>

How did the late 19th century's innovations and advances alter how people worked? The typewriter, the light bulb, and the telephone all had a significant impact on office work and created new jobs for women. Many laborers were liberated from grueling labor by the Industrial Revolution.

To know more about mid-nineteenth century visit:-

brainly.com/question/3604586

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
You decide to charge your new cellphone on a credit card and pay it off immediately. Does this help or hurt your credit? Why or
Eva8 [605]

Answer:

It would be better to make monthly payments on the phone because this will help build credit history, provided you make your payments on time

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is the BEST example of
astraxan [27]

Answer:

B. Put less work in, get more work out

Explanation:

Efficiency means that you want to maximize something with putting little in. With this, the only answer that would make sense would be B.

If you were to put more work in and get less work out that would not be efficient at all. It would be the complete opposite.

If you were to put less work in and get less work out that is still inefficient.

If you put more work in and get more work out that could appear as efficient, but you are still putting in a lot of work which is not efficient.

Thus the best answer would be B. Put less work in, get more work out.

Hope this helps!! Ask questions if you need!

4 0
2 years ago
French king that believed in the Divine Right of Kings. He had very few limits on his royal power. He lived in splendor and exce
strojnjashka [21]
The correct answer to your question is; Louis XIV
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the name of the worship of Demeter
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of how life began to change in the United States in the 1920s
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a tactic the French used to keep peaceful relations with Native Americans? Choose 1 answer: Choose 1
    7·1 answer
  • How do Marshall court rulings support entrepreneurship and economic growth?
    9·1 answer
  • How did advancements in farming cause farmers to struggle during the 1890s?
    8·1 answer
  • “...while Great Britain did give-in to threats of war, the agreement was fair and equitable. Neither nation had a clear legal ti
    6·1 answer
  • The federal government's powers are mostly located in the ______________
    10·2 answers
  • Problems associated (connected with) rapid urbanization included..
    14·1 answer
  • Name
    11·1 answer
  • Why is Barbara McIntyre writing to the president?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!