It put them in jobs that normally men held, because the men were off fighting so the women had to take over jobs that traditionally men held.
Answer:
In no way would it have been possible to prevent World War II. Western powers, especially Britain and France, attempted to carry out appeasement policies against the imperialist actions of Germany in Austria and the Czech Republic. The United States, on the other hand, was carrying out an isolationist policy, with which it hardly intervened in the moment before the war.
In any case, no alternative could have worked in the face of Adolf Hitler's imperialist impetus, who wanted to create a predominant German empire throughout Europe. Nor could the expansionist thirst of Italy, whose leader Benito Mussolini sought to control the Mediterranean and regain a position of power after World War I, could have been quenched. Furthermore, the Empire of Japan was in the same position as its two allies. All this created a warlike breeding ground, which in no way could be restrained peacefully without huge losses on the part of Western countries.
Answer:
a
reason:
The "New Deal" was a series of programs, public work projects, financial reforms, and regulations enacted by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the United States between 1933 and 1939.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>True
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The saving rate is rate; the expenses go low as the curves shift to the right. There are various ways that investment falls. If the loan cost rises, state due to contractionary money related or financial approach, speculation will fall. Thus, in the short run, the expansionary monetary arrangement will likewise make investment fall as swarming out happens. Another fascinating reason for a fall with regards to speculation is an exogenous decline in venture spending. This occurs when firms choose to contribute less without respect for the loan cost.
Answer:I would send soldiers duh.
Explanation:
Okay
