1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irina1246 [14]
3 years ago
11

What is the stance of other Middle Eastern nations in regards to the conflict?

History
1 answer:
Sveta_85 [38]3 years ago
7 0
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a huge issue in the region. Israel has fought multiple wars with each of its four neighbors, all of whom nominally support the Palestinian national cause. Today, it has peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan, but its relations with its other neighbors, Syria and Lebanon, are fraught. There are large, mistreated Palestinian refugee communities in all of Israel’s neighbors but Egypt. Outside of its immediate neighbors, the three most important regional states in the conflict are Iran, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia. Here’s a guide to each country’s role.
You might be interested in
One result of martin luther’s religious reform efforts was rejection of the chalcedonian orthodoxy
mario62 [17]
Yes it is true. So you may do your work.
7 0
4 years ago
Which of the following describes how the Haitian rebellion and the Convention of 1818 are alike? (1 point)
VikaD [51]

Convention of 1818 and the Haitian Revolution (or Rebellion) resulted in more territory for the United States (C).

The Convention directly resulted in more territory for the United States as Britain ceded all its territory South of the 49th parallel. On the other hand, the Haitian Revolution's contribution to US territory was rather indirect: having lost control over french Caribbean landholding influenced Napoleon Bonaparte’s decision to sell Louisiana. This lead to the Louisiana Purchase (1803) which almost doubled US territory.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the main reason behind the Sepoy Rebellion of 1857?
Alexeev081 [22]

Answer:

The Sepoy Rebellion of 1857 was an uprising against the colonial rulers in British India. It was the largest uprising of the 19th century against a colonial ruler, anywhere in the world. The rebellion began with a mutiny of sepoys, Indian soldiers employed by the British, in Bengal. From that area the rebellion spread over Hindustan. It became a serious threat to the British when Indian princes such as the nawab of Awadh and the Mogul emperor in Delhi chose the side of the mutiny.  

The sepoys were Indian auxiliary troops deployed by the British colonial administration. They included both Hindus and Muslims. In 1857 their number was of 190,000 men, who were paid by the East India Company.  

There was general dissatisfaction with the way the English treated the Indian princes and with the exploitation of the impoverished farmers. The uprising broke out as a result of the discovery that rifle bullets were smeared with pork or beef fat, causing both Hindus and Muslims to be hurt in their religious feelings. The rebellion was initiated by Mangal Pandey and the main captain was Nana Sahib.

However, the uprising failed because most of the princes remained loyal to the British administration and other indigenous troops such as the Sikhs and Gurkhas did not join. The uprising lasted until the beginning of 1858 and was eventually suppressed by the English with barbaric punishment. It led to the collapse of the British East India Company and to placing British India under the English crown. The Sepoy regiments were then reorganized.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is the dominant country of the Central Asian sub-region
maxonik [38]

Think of your favorite video or board game!

How would you advise your friends who might be interested in playing the game?

Discuss the probabilities involved in winning the game.

Which model could you use to support your recommendation and how?

3 0
3 years ago
Do you agree or disagree with this statement: “Representative democracy works better than direct democracy in large countries.”
pav-90 [236]
I agree because a smart representor will base his oppinion off his state but its ultimetly up to him. Lets say 1/2 the country are idiots (not saying there are) but if so then they would most likely vote for the wrong person but you must qualify to be a representor to decide the fate of the presidency.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Name three adjectives to describe carter based on the campaign messages?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following acts established the Department of Agriculture​?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did Iran become more politically open during the first years of Mohammad reza Shah's reign?
    12·1 answer
  • Who were the members of the “Big Four” ?
    6·2 answers
  • Which wife of a Patriot wrote to her husband during the American Revolution about the unequal treatment of blacks and women?
    5·2 answers
  • The moroccan army invaded and captured timbuktu and gao during the reign of which kingdom
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following scenarios would be most likely to cause a small bank to be less willing to loan money to small businesses
    15·2 answers
  • PLSS HELP ILL GIVE 35 PONTS ITS EASY JUST THAT IM DU.MB
    15·1 answer
  • How is the republic different from direct democracy
    10·2 answers
  • Bill clinton chose which pop tune as his official 1992 presidential campaign song after hearing it in a cab?.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!