Answer:
<em>Comparative politics is investigating internal processes within countries or political entities by comparing their characteristics according to a specific model.</em> Though it can potentially address a wide range of aspects, comparative politics is most widely applied to such <em>issues </em>as <u>politics of democratic and authoritarian states</u>, <u>political identit</u>y, <u>regime change</u> and <u>democratization</u>, <u>voting behavior</u> and a number of others.
<em>Comparativists often ask</em> how certain processes, for example, democratization, differ in specific states that still can be placed under the same analysis because they share certain characteristics.
Following the <u>democratization example</u>, let us take post-soviet countries. Comparativists may take most similar countries that share many similarities, such as Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), or most different countries, such as Estonia and Belarus. Here comparativists may ask, why Estonia developed a strong democratic regime, while Belarus fell into a consolidated authoritarian regime.
Non Metal
brittle, poor conductor for heat poor conductor of electricity, dull surface
Metal
malleable, Good Conductor for electricity, Good Conductor of heat, shiny surface
Hope This Helps :D
<span>The sanctions for the failure to admit facts made through a request for admissions are the cost of proving the facts not admitted may be assessed against the party who failed to admit those facts. This might be bad situation to be in for the party in speaking but the judge cannot dismiss the case at hand nor is the judgment against them. They still have a chance to fight.</span>
I believe the answer is: semantic encoding
Semantic encoding refers to putting the core meaning of a certain words, phrase ,or picture in our memory rather than only putting the sound or how those things look like. The experiment concludes that memories that acquired through semantic encoding would stay much longer compared to normal method.
