How did the rise of McCarthyism change the US in the 1950s

History

1 answer:

nadya68 [22]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

What I believe is that McCarthyism had a good idea at first which was to remove communism from the U.S, however, McCarthy took it too far. Their team began ruthlessly removing accusing people of communists even though some weren't and they would drive a lot of people out of business due to false claims that the team received or that people made. So during this time, people could be accused of communism and could have property loss, be fined, filed, or even imprisoned all without requiring evidence. McCarthy would allow damages done and some violence as well.

You might be interested in

all of these contributed to the growing desire for the independence among the British colonies in North America during the late

Natalka [10]

Were there choices for this?

3 0

3 years ago

How old was patrick swayze when he died and what year did he die?.

Tems11 [23]

Answer: He was 57

He passed away on September 14, 2009

5 0

2 years ago

Can leopards change there spots

laila [671]

Leapords cannot change their spots. Humans can't change their eye colour. So no.

4 0

3 years ago

The factory system focused on efficiency and profit by?

ratelena [41]

The factory system focused on efficiency and profit by lowering production time and costs through the use of machines.

What is a factory system?

The factory system is a production strategy that makes use of machinery and labor division.

Contrary to the domestic system, it is built on the concentration of industry into enormous establishments.

Therefore it has a main focus on lowering production time and costs through the use of machines.

Learn more about the "factory system" here.
brainly.com/question/14259185

#SPJ1

6 0

1 year ago

What would James Madison say about allowing a person elected to the house of representatives to srve at the same toime on the su

daser333 [38]

Answer:

He would not be happy due to the fact that he wanted all the 3 powers to be separated from one other. His reason for being unhappy will be because he felt the separation of the powers couldn't be possible with the system in the question stated where there is 1 representative for 2 powers.

Explanation:

The major reasoning behind his thinking is that if one person were allowed to serve in both house of reps and Supreme court, they would likely influence the others in both branches to take side with them which could lead to forming a strong force with two of the branches, which will in turn lead to a great threat to the system.

6 0

3 years ago