How did the rise of McCarthyism change the US in the 1950s

History

1 answer:

nadya68 [22]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

What I believe is that McCarthyism had a good idea at first which was to remove communism from the U.S, however, McCarthy took it too far. Their team began ruthlessly removing accusing people of communists even though some weren't and they would drive a lot of people out of business due to false claims that the team received or that people made. So during this time, people could be accused of communism and could have property loss, be fined, filed, or even imprisoned all without requiring evidence. McCarthy would allow damages done and some violence as well.

You might be interested in

witch president was an advocate for the war on drugs, a drug policy intended to crack on illicit drug use and distribution

White raven [17]

Answer: President Nixon

Explanation: He increased the drug control agencies,

3 0

3 years ago

On the map, which colony is the arrow pointing to?

Vlad1618 [11]

The map is pointing to the middle colonies, but the middle colonies consisted of PA, NJ, Delaware etc, but the arrow is specifically on New Jersey so I would assume New Jersey.

7 0

3 years ago

Congress cannot override a presidential veto of a tax bill.<br> a. true<br> b. false

Sonbull [250]

They can override it with a 2/3 vote in both the House and senate, so it’ll be false.

5 0

3 years ago

Lord, what fools these mortals be!” The words of The Bard have arguably never been so apt. But the character Puck speaks these i

Nezavi [6.7K]

The correct answer is A Midsummer Night's Dream.
Puck is one of the characters who appears in this Shakespeare's play and utters that famous quote "Lord, what fools these mortals be!"
He is addressing the humans who have entered the enchanted forest which is supposed to be scary.

8 0

3 years ago

Briefly describe ONE major difference between Potters and Holts historical interpretation of the Civil War.

lakkis [162]

<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>

Potter's Historical Interpretations of the Civil War:

Students of history state that he had a lopsided scholarly history, since he offered a dimension of tolerance to the genius bondage philosophies that he doesn't grant to the abolitionist subjugation development. Abolitionists were everything from oppressive to helpful people, as per Potter.

Holt's Historical Interpretation of the Civil War:

Holt, then again, was a teacher so he given an increasingly clear translation of the Civil War, indeed, Holt sees the contention as a breakdown in America's majority rule political procedure. No longer contrasts must be settled inside the field of fight, as per him.

4 0

2 years ago