The answer is : The demand is elastic.
Elasticity =
[(80,000 - 180,000)/((80,000+180,000)/2)]/[($40 - $30)/(($40 + $30)/2)]|
[(-100,000/130,000)]/[(10/55)] = -.7692/.1818= -4.23
The answer is -4.23, however when considering own price elasticity of demand, we ignore the negative sign and look at the absolute value to determine whether it is elastic or inelastic.
what is your question ??
I think u have missed some parts here in the question ..
Answer:
2.27%
; 61.54%
Explanation:
Given that,
Sales/Total assets = 2.2x
Return on assets (ROA) = 5%
Return on equity (ROE) = 13%
Therefore,
Return on assets = Profit margin × Assets turnover
0.05 = Profit margin × 2.2
Profit margin = 0.05 ÷ 2.2
Profit margin = 0.0227 or 2.27%
Percent of total assets is from equity:
= Return on assets ÷ Return on equity
= 0.05 ÷ 0.13
= 0.3846 or 38.46%
Hence, the debt is as follows:
Debt = Assets - equity
= 1 - 0.3846
= 0.6154 or 61.54%
The process through which a product or service takes root initially in simple applications at the bottom of a market and then moves up, eventually displacing established companies, is referred to as <u>Disruptive Innovation</u>.
In a business idea, disruptive innovation is an innovation that creates a brand new market and price network or enters at the lowest of an existing market and in the end displaces established marketplace-leading companies, products, and alliances.
Disruptive innovation refers to using a generation that upsets a structure, instead of "disruptive technology", which refers back to the era itself. Amazon, launched as an online bookstall in the mid-Nineties, is an example of disruptive innovation.
Disruptive innovation is the manner by using which a smaller enterprise—normally with fewer sources—moves upmarket and demanding situations larger, hooked-up corporations.
Learn more about disruptive innovation here brainly.com/question/17185200
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer is NO.
Explanation:
The answer is NO since the tax cut does not equate or rather would not be an effective stimulus due to the fact that debt reduction would not stimulate or increase consumption.
To properly understand the narrative of the question and the answer herein, let us define what effective stimulus is.
Effective stimulus or as preferably known as An economic stimulus is the utilization of funds or design of that helps agitate growth during downtime or recession in a country. The decision makers of a country mostly utilize the tactics of giving rebates and increasing government expenses to name a few.
Now relating it back to the question, since the intention of the rebate is to ease payment on tax does not equate to increase in consumption, the answer is a NO.
