The correct answer to this question is B) They can lead historians to arrive at very different interpretations of an event.
Personal biases and points of view influence historians when they are studying evidence in that they can lead historians to arrive at very different interpretations of an event.
That is why so important that historians maintain objectivity when doing research. Understandably, each historian has its own background of studies, preferent authors and way of thinking. But historians have to set aside all of that in order to present their investigations objectively, based on facts, numbers, statistics, results that can be validated.
Without the support of federal troops, segregation in the South lasted from the time of Reconstruction until 1964 and Civil rights Act, there was racial segregation in many counties in southern states till that year.
When the party that lost a court case asks for a higher court to review the decision, that person is using the right to "appeal," since cases can go all the way up to the Supreme Court.
