The answer is "jumping to conclusions".
Jumping to conclusions is a mental term alluding to a correspondence snag where one "judge[s] or decide[s] something without having every one of the actualities; to achieve unjustifiable conclusions". As it were, "the point at which I neglect to recognize what I watched direct from what I have just gathered or assumed". Because it includes settling on choices without having enough data to make sure they are correct, this can offer ascent to terrible or impulsive choices.
Answer:
event-driven
Explanation:
<u>Event driven</u> couples vacillate between commitment and ambivalence and often disagree on how committed they were as well as why they became committed in the first place. Event driven couples have relationships that are triggered based on recent happening in the couples lives with no orderliness in the progression of the relationship or commitment and such couples are unhappy as opposed to relationship driven couples which follow a pattern in the development of their relationship until they eventually get married and is more stable.
Depression, bipolar and possibly schizophrenia. hope this helps
Answer:
Group polarization
Explanation:
In psychology, group polarization alludes to members of a group making decisions that are more extreme than their original predisposition. It occurs due to individuals determining their social and personal worth based on comparison to others. In making group decisions, most members take the process on with the thought that their additions are better than those of the other members.
The present is key to the past (B)
