Hitler's Foreign Policy<span> Aims. To destroy the Treaty of Versailles imposed on </span>Germany<span> after her defeat in World War One. Hitler felt the Treaty was unfair and most Germans supported this view. To unite all </span>German<span> speakers together in one country. I hope this very helpful
</span>
Probably not the answer your looking for but the right one - hopefully no way because he’s not gonna be the president
The statement that "<em>Negroes </em><em>have fought and died for this country</em>" is the strongest argument made by Ara to prohibit the lynching of Negroes.
<h3>Why do they
lynch Negroes?</h3>
These punishment served as a method of racial control in terrorizing the black Americans into submission or into an inferior position.
In conclusion, Ara Lee Settle asserted that some Negroes have fought and died for this country, and that this is enough to make such lynching illegal.
Read more about lynching
<em>brainly.com/question/1695764</em>
Answer:
The Nazis win and a weak Nazi regime would be established.
Explanation:
The Southern Embargo on cotton led Britain and France to become less reliant on American cotton. Colonies like India and Egypt decreased Britain and France's reliance on American cotton, which was a staple of the Southern economy. The South emerged economically devastated, and had a long recovery. But if they did not return to the Union, and they could not rely on Northern industry, this recovery would be even slower. And with the division, both parts of the union would be significantly weaker. For this reason, America would have played a less significant role in WWII. The result is speculative of course, but it's possible that if America decided not to enter, or could not produce a strong army, then the Nazis would have had a much easier time with their goal. I think that the only scenario where the Nazis would have won is an instance where they developed nuclear bombs first--and used a scorched Earth strategy to eliminate the Russian threat. This would be my speculation, but past victory, it's hard to say what would have happened. The Roman Government lasted for thousands of years, and perhaps the Nazi regime could last for a while before becoming de-stabilized, but I don't think it would have been a strong centralized regime. The reason I say this is because not even Caesar or Napoleon (brilliant diplomats and military strategists) could not achieve this. But this (of course) is speculative.
(Fun question, never done "hypothetical history")
I’m confused by the question but do u mean why are they?
Palestine used to be controlled by Britain but when the Palestinians were growing uneasy because they were being uneasy of the agreement Britain mandated them over the League of Nations. The league proposed a divide of the star even though it he majority were Palestinians. They tried to fight but they kept getting beaten and with even loss Israel took land leaving Palestinians refugees (not all but like you know what I mean) so now they are still fight there is some more but that the base. And now the Area called Palestine has become a group of Israel, West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Which majority of Palestinians live in the Gaza Strip and West Bank. Tell be if I got something wrong or need more or I completely just wrecked this whole answer
