The commander-in-chief role addresses major problems, while the chief of state role is mostly symbolic.
I'd say B, because the armada was disrupted. No ships were burnt, but they were broken apart, meaning none returned. I hope this helps!
The Annexation of Texas, the Mexican-American War, and the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo, 1845–1848. ... Accordingly, while the United States extended diplomatic recognition to Texas, it took no further action concerning annexation until 1844, when President John Tyler restarted negotiations with the Republic of Texas.
The purpose of the League of Nations was to prevent through collective security and disarmament and settling international disputes through negotiation and arbitration. The League of Nations also wanted to take care of labor conditions, just treatment of native inhabitants, human and drug trafficking, arms trade, global health, prisoners of war and protection of minorities in Europe.
