investigate how Europeans perceive the consequences of massive migration flows in their country and their everyday life. In general, respondents consider the immigration of people outside Europe dangerous for their personal security, as well as a threat for the economy and the culture of their country. More precisely, in the 28 countries sampled, 62% of respondents think that the massive influx of immigrants in their country will increase the threat of terrorism and the crime rates. At the same time, 57% of Europeans believe that non-EU immigration harms the cultural homogeneity of their own country. This result is in line with the data shown by the REScEU Mass Survey conducted in 2016 in six EU member states (France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Sweden, and United Kingdom). Finally, European citizens also worry about the negative economic impact brought by immigration. Almost three respondents out of four (73%) believe that handling immigration poses a huge financial burden for receiving countries. Another 61% of them think that the mass influx of immigrants from outside of the continent set back the EU’s economy.
Answer:
hi
Explanation:
missouri country road 9030
Answer:
The high seas are reserved for peaceful purposes
Explanation:
- These are areas that lie beyond the national laws also-called as international waters and are these marine areas that around the distance of the 200 nautical miles.
- Are referred to as the Exclusive Economic zone and these water covers about half of the earth's surface and makes about 2/3 of the world oceans.
Answer:
when the plates smash into eachother they start to move upward to create mountains. Mountain ranges can just be a large collection of plates that squished together.
Countries with anti-natalist policies are China, India, and Uzbekistan.
Explanation:
The countries can roughly be divided into having pro-natalist or anti-natalist policies. The decision as to which of these two policies is implement depends on the area available, population size, increase or decrease rates, and available resources. Some countries have been swinging between the two policies, setting one for a decade and than turning to the other for a decade, returning to the previous one, and again to the other one, like in the case of Iran.
Some countries that have anti-natalist policies are:
China has such policy for several decades now. Initially it was only one child per family that was allowed, and only few years ago it was allowed for two children by family. The reason for this was the rapid increase of the already huge population and the fear that it will lead to economic and social collapse on the long run. The same problem has been the case in India as well. Even though there are policies that are anti-natalist, the people don't seem to apply to them, though the birthrates have been steadily dropping recently due to the development and gradual increase of the standard of living. Uzbekistan, on the other hand, is castrating the women after they have two children. The reason for this is that the country doesn't have enough resources so they desperately are trying to not become overpopulated and collapse.
