Authenticating or Identifying Evidence, Rule 901 (a) ALL IN ALL. The proponent must provide evidence adequate to sustain a finding that the item is what the proponent asserts it is in order to satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence.
<h3>What is Rule 901. Authenticating or Identifying Evidence?</h3>
Authenticating or Identifying Evidence, Rule 901 (a) ALL IN ALL. The proponent must provide evidence adequate to sustain a finding that the item is what the proponent asserts it is in order to satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence. The authenticity of the evidence is one need that must be met for it to be considered admissible by the court. A rule of evidence known as "authentication" stipulates that there must be adequate evidence to support a determination that the thing in question is what its proponent says.
The first step in authenticating a piece of evidence is to call a witness who can attest from personal experience that it is what the claimant says it is. As an illustration, in United States v. Evidence must be sufficiently demonstrated to establish its authenticity in order for it to be admitted into court. Only a prima facie showing is necessary, hence the burden of proof for authentication is relatively low.
To learn more about Rule 901 refer to:
brainly.com/question/24261690
#SPJ4
Answer:
The Embargo Act of 1807 and the War of 1812
During the Napoleonic Wars in Europe, Britain and France were at war with each other and the United States was neutral. ... However, it turned the U.S. economy inward, causing the nation to create and rely on its own goods, spurring the industrial revolution of the nation.
Explanation:
What Caused the American Industrial Revolution? - Investopedia This is the site where I got the info. I hope this helps!
Answer:
No, not all substances transfer the same amount of thermal energy during a certain amount of time because some materials are bad heat transfers. For example, metal is a better heat transfer than wood. ... Temperature and kinetic energy relate because temperature tells how much motion is in an object.
I believe the lather that there should be gun restriction because modern weapons have become 100 times more accessible today than in the past. It is fundamental to understand that guns are not the problem itself but the power lies in the individual who can use that gun for dangerous, threatening reasons. So Yes gun restriction is necessary because every person isn't capable of using a gun properly.
please vote my answer brainliest. thanks!
