1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
PSYCHO15rus [73]
2 years ago
14

Which answer summarizes the main argument between the Federalists and Anti-federalists during the Constitutional Convention?. .

They argued about federalism and how the federal and state governments would share power.. . They argued about the Articles of Confederation and how to change it to serve the government better.. . They argued about The Federalist Papers and what the content should be.. . They argued about ratification and how many states would need to agree for the Constitution to take effect.
History
2 answers:
sergiy2304 [10]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

They argued about ratification and how many states would need to agree for the Constitution to take effect.

Explanation:

Sveta_85 [38]2 years ago
3 0
They argued about ratification and how many states would need to agree for the Constitution to take effect is the answer that summarizes the main argument between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists during the Constitutional Convention. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the last option.
You might be interested in
Me ajudem por favor ;-; ;-; ;-;
atroni [7]
Yo hablo español mensaje a mi primero y después te doy la repuesta
5 0
2 years ago
What type of government did the United States want Poland and Germany adopt?
worty [1.4K]
They wanted them to adapt Democracy. (Because the US was a democracy) 
8 0
3 years ago
What court case established the power of judicial review that allows the Supreme Court to strike down laws that violate the US C
Tom [10]

Answer:

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review in the United States, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws, statutes, and some government actions that violate the Constitution of the United States. Click to see full answer

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
What was the eventful outcome of the Vietnam War? ( Will Mark Brainliest). Do Not Answer If You Truly Don't Know Please. ​
ira [324]

Answer:

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "A cease fire led to the establishment of a neutral zone between North Vietnam and South Vietnam."

Explanation: the eventual outcome of the Vietnam War is that A cease fire led to the establishment of a neutral zone between North Vietnam and South Vietnam.

8 0
2 years ago
Which of these best describes the political situation in China between World War I and World War II?
shusha [124]

Answer:

a conflict between nationalist and communist movements

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are two other names for a market economy
    5·1 answer
  • What is an advantage of a market economic system?
    6·2 answers
  • What did President Woodrow Wilson do for Franklin Delano Roosevelt in return for Roosevelt's key support of Wilson at the 1912 D
    13·1 answer
  • What is social responsibility, and how do business show it?​
    11·1 answer
  • Each of the following is a principle of the samurai honor code bushido except
    13·1 answer
  • In what sense are modern universities similar to the Agora of ancient Athens?
    14·2 answers
  • The Khmer Rouge was a government that killed millions of people in _____.
    11·2 answers
  • What did the development of writing enable the Sumerians to do?
    9·1 answer
  • Question 2 of 35
    8·1 answer
  • What are the five pillars of faith for Muslims?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!