Marx and Engels plan to close the economic gap by nationalizing the "means of productions" would result in the working class having control of this part of society. In this case "nationalizing" means that the means of production would be owned by the public as a whole rather than an individual. This would allow more citizens to make profit off of goods and services. This public ownership would help to make sure more people have a lot of money, rather than a select few.
The second statement discusses a perfect communist society and how it would be ideal for the citizens living in it. They argue that other countries would see how working for the common good would be beneficial. From there, they would adopt the system. Then, communism would spread like wildfire.
Answer: The election was a political realignment that ushered in a generation of Democratic-Republican leadership.
Explanation: In what is sometimes referred to as the "Revolution of 1800", Vice President Thomas Jefferson of the Democratic-Republican Party defeated incumbent President John Adams of the Federalist Party so b*** pay attention in school
The power sharing arrangement that the fascist had in the Italian governments in the 1920s helped to prepare some of its members to handle parts of the economy well when the global depression hit. The investment in what we call "infrastructure" was an appropriate public use of money. The modernization of healthcare in the 1930s put many women through medical schools so they could staff the village and town clinics built as part of the public works program. These useful public works and the hydroelectric plants created to power the "re-birth" of the Roman Empire under Mussolini and his fascist technocrats planned to build and rule. The move towards autarky in the 1930s was a wasteful and foolish plan to be self-sufficient in a way that Italy never was during the actual era of the Roman Empire. So while the public health and the infrastructure spending was appropriate and helpful to Italian society, war and autarky were economically disastrous distortions of a nationalist economic system. The disaster that was the "struggle for wheat" and the "struggle for iron" and entry into war on the side of Germany sank the Italian economy.
Answer:violate the state constitution.
Explanation:good luck
The soldiers that worked for the unions gave their lives
