Answer:
<h3>The white southern democrats who promised that they would recognize civil rights and political rights for African-Americans as part of the compromise of 1877 did not hold true to this promise.</h3><h3 />
Explanation:
The Compromise of 1877 emerged when there arose a dispute in the 1876's presidential election. Though democratic candidate Samuel Tilden won more majority votes than Republican candidate Rutherford B. Hayes, the electoral votes of Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina were caught in a disagreement. Thus, the candidate who was to become the next president remained answered.
At this, the white southern democrats presented a number of promises to the African-American voters which they would fulfill if they come into power. These promises contained in the Compromise of 1877 included voting rights for all, withdrawal of federal troops from the Southern states and the freedom to home-rule in the South.
However, all these promises were not fulfilled. Instead the Jim Crow Segregation bill was imposed across the South and voting rights of black men were disfranchised.
Answer:
Explanation:
Challenging the contemporary belief that emotional damage invariably results from new religious movement participation, this study shows that membership in and exit from a world-rejecting the new religious movement may initiate the development of increased reflexivity and a personal sense of self for some former members.
I hope this helped.
-Queenbeauty666-
The answer is B
the both plans wanted the southerners to take a loyalty oath to the union
Answer:
...............................................
Explanation:
Answer:
Mark as brainliest
Explanation:
symbolic presence in international legal accounts of the 19th century, but for historians of the era its importance has often been doubted. This article seeks to re-interpret the place of the Berlin General Act in late 19th-century history, suggesting that the divergence of views has arisen largely as a consequence of an inattentiveness to the place of systemic logics in legal regimes of this kind.
Issue Section:
Articles
INTRODUCTION
The Berlin West Africa Conference of 1884-1885 has assumed a canonical place in historical accounts of late 19th-century imperialism 1 and this is no less true of the accounts provided by legal scholars seeking to trace the colonial origins of contemporary international law. 2 The overt purpose of the Conference was to ‘manage’ the ongoing process of colonisation in Africa (the ‘Scramble’ as it was dubbed by a Times columnist) so as to avoid the outbreak of armed conflict between rival colonial powers. Its outcome was the conclusion of a General Act 3 ratified by all major colonial powers including the US. 4 Among other things, the General Act set out the conditions under which territory might be acquired on the coast of Africa; it internationalised two rivers (the Congo and the Niger); it orchestrated a new campaign to abolish the overland trade in slaves; and it declared as ‘neutral’ a vast swathe of Central Africa delimited as the ‘conventional basin of the Congo’. A side event was the recognition given to King Leopold’s fledgling Congo Free State that had somewhat mysteriously emerged out of the scientific and philanthropic activities of the Association internationale du Congo . 5
If for lawyers and historians the facts of the Conference are taken as a common starting point, this has not prevented widely divergent interpretations of its significance from emerging. On one side, one may find an array of international lawyers, from John Westlake 6 in the 19th century to Tony Anghie 7 in the 21 st century, affirming the importance of the Conference and its General Act for having created a legal and political framework for the subsequent partition of Africa. 8 For Anghie, Berlin ‘transformed Africa into a conceptual terra nullius ’, silencing native resistance through the subordination of their claims to sovereignty, and providing, in the process, an effective ideology of colonial rule. It was a conference, he argues, ‘which determined in important ways the future of the continent and which continues to have a profound influence on the politics of contemporary Africa’. 9
