This is false. Carbon dioxide is taken in, and oxygen out. Oxygen is not converted to carbon dioxide. It is a waste of the chemical reaction taking place, just like carbon dioxide is a waste in the respiratory process for us.
I hope this helps!
~kaikers
Answer:
this one`s been up for debate for awhile now.
1. it depends on the organism
learning about an organism could be considered 'easier' to study in different ways. for example, if you are studying marine life, you will most likely have to keep it in a water habitat to watch it alive. If you are studying a land species, then watching from it`s natural habitat will give you more accurate results. sometimes the environment can affect an organisms internal systems more than you may think. this leads into my second point.
2. it depends on what you are trying to study
if you are trying to learn about the mating process, seasonal activity, migration, or external behavior, then monitoring it from it`s natural habitat or an area that is a close copy is your best option. but if you are looking into studying internal organs/systems or cells, then in <em>most</em> cases, the organism will need to be taken out of its natural habitat. only in very careful situations is it left in a habitat during examination.
I think it is A but i am not sure
Answer:
Electrons are subatomic particles, whose electric charge is negative one elementary charge. They belong to the first generation of the lepton particle family, and are generally thought to be elementary particles because they have no known components or substructure.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is D.
Explanation:
because dwarf planets are found in the kuper belt as well, and A and B are actually just there to trick you. Hope that helped.
