1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marissa [1.9K]
3 years ago
5

Why is participating in a group a powerful way for a person to influence government? Voting has no effect unless people in a gro

up agree to vote for the same people. It is more fun to participate in government when you are working with others. Individuals cannot have any influence on government unless as part of a group. Elected officials are more likely to respond to issues that have many supporters
History
2 answers:
yan [13]3 years ago
7 0
"<span>Elected officials are more likely to respond to issues that have many supporters" While it is true that every vote counts, elected officials want to remain in office, and that means pleasing a majority of people either in their district or in their state. </span>
diamong [38]3 years ago
6 0

Elected officials are more likely to respond to issues that have many supporters. The answer is D.

You might be interested in
Read the quote. Based on Sinclair's description,
galina1969 [7]

Answer:  The answer is No, he was appalled by the way meat was handled

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 1882,the u.s.congress passed
ASHA 777 [7]
The answer would be C. The Chinese. 

<span>The "witch" immigrants were banned; it was a holdover from the Salem, MA witch arsons.
</span>
I hope this helps. :)
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In order to be a part of the assembly of Athens, which of the following are true? Select all that apply.
Butoxors [25]

Answer:

C-You would be chosen by lottery

D-You could only be a free man

3 0
3 years ago
Read the excerpt below from the Supreme Court ruling in the Scott v. Sandford. [T]he legislation and histories of the times, and
omeli [17]
The main point of this excerpt is that African-Americans were not considered US citizens.

In the Supreme Court case Dred Scott vs. Sandford, Scott is suing for his freedom from slavery. This is because his master brought him to the Wisconsin territory, a territory where slavery was outlawed.

However, the Supreme Court ruled against him. The reason why they ruled against him is based on the excerpt above. The Declaration of Independence did not make it blatantly clear that slaves were considered citizens. Since they were not considered citizens, they had no legal rights that slave owners had to respect.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3.Use the chart to answer the following question.
motikmotik

Answer:

C

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was one of the direct result of the Cuban missile crisis
    5·1 answer
  • Why was it difficult for European merchants to trade with China before the early 1800's
    15·2 answers
  • How did Senator J. William Fulbright build support for the doves in Congress?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following was NOT true about the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire of 1911? A. it resulted in stronger enforcement o
    14·1 answer
  • 2) How did the Emancipation Proclamation open the door for black soldiers?
    15·1 answer
  • Describe the policy of containment during the Cold War. What was the goal of the containment policy?
    8·1 answer
  • Which factors lead to industrialization in the United States ?
    12·1 answer
  • What does the word comprises mean
    6·2 answers
  • Help me please please ​
    6·1 answer
  • The competition between which of the following represents the Cold War?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!